From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <51E5D0AF.8090207@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:01:03 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Sharp CC: Theodore Ts'o , Olivier Galibert , David Lang , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Darren Hart , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Willy Tarreau , stable , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML References: <20130715195316.GF15531@xanatos> <20130715204135.GH15531@xanatos> <1373926109.17876.221.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130715223615.GI15531@xanatos> <20130716211235.GG4994@xanatos> <20130716212704.GB9371@thunk.org> <20130716224357.GK4994@xanatos> In-Reply-To: <20130716224357.GK4994@xanatos> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/16/13 15:43, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > Yes, that's true. Some kernel developers are better at moderating their > comments and tone towards individuals who are "sensitive". Others > simply don't give a shit. So we need to figure out how to meet > somewhere in the middle, in order to establish a baseline of civility. So it's polite enough to curse if you don't direct it at anyone in particular? I'm sensitive so I disagree. -- ~Randy