From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <51EDEA9C.7070709@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:29:48 +0800 From: Li Zefan MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KOSAKI Motohiro CC: Ben Hutchings , Rob Landley , James Bottomley , , LKML , Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag References: <1374379903.3719.25@driftwood> <1374419389.16533.86.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013/7/23 5:24, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> I review what I can, but recently have often missed the 2 day review >> period. >> >> Review from the authors and maintainers is probably more valuable than >> that from generalists on the stable list. > >>>>From point of subsystem developers view, the problem is there are too many > stable branches. I can't memorize what is different each other. > Currently www.kernel.org > lists two stable and five longterm branches. Who know all of them? > Eventually I only > checked them when I have enough much spare time. I only check those maintained by Greg.