From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, hpa@linux.intel.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
"tip-bot for H.J. Lu" <tipbot@zytor.com>,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, fpu: correct the asm constraints for fxsave , unbreak mxcsr.daz
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:19:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F2D9D2.8050405@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-eaa5a990191d204ba0f9d35dbe5505ec2cdd1460@git.kernel.org>
Hi everyone,
I have tagged this one for -stable, but it is a definite "maybe", so I
wanted to:
a) qualify that tagging, and
b) perhaps use it as a boundary case for policy clarification.
This patch is an old bug, an incorrect assembly constraint, but as
happens with this type of bug it is being exposed by a change in gcc.
Therefore, although this is neither a regression per se in the kernel
nor in gcc, it is a regression in the combined output.
The bug is obvious; the fix at the very least *should* be obvious; the
main source of risk would appear that it might trigger bugs in very old
versions of gcc.
The gain is less inherently obvious: currently the only MXCSR bit
affected is DAZ, although this also affects any future MXCSR bits. Most
users do not care about DAZ, but the ones that do generally care *a lot*
about it as their applications may suffer very bad performance otherwise.
There is a kernel bugzilla for this:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60633
... but it doesn't really add any additional information.
-hpa
On 07/26/2013 09:19 AM, tip-bot for H.J. Lu wrote:
> Commit-ID: eaa5a990191d204ba0f9d35dbe5505ec2cdd1460
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/eaa5a990191d204ba0f9d35dbe5505ec2cdd1460
> Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:11:56 -0700
> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
> CommitDate: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:11:56 -0700
>
> x86, fpu: correct the asm constraints for fxsave, unbreak mxcsr.daz
>
> GCC will optimize mxcsr_feature_mask_init in arch/x86/kernel/i387.c:
>
> memset(&fx_scratch, 0, sizeof(struct i387_fxsave_struct));
> asm volatile("fxsave %0" : : "m" (fx_scratch));
> mask = fx_scratch.mxcsr_mask;
> if (mask == 0)
> mask = 0x0000ffbf;
>
> to
>
> memset(&fx_scratch, 0, sizeof(struct i387_fxsave_struct));
> asm volatile("fxsave %0" : : "m" (fx_scratch));
> mask = 0x0000ffbf;
>
> since asm statement doesn’t say it will update fx_scratch. As the
> result, the DAZ bit will be cleared. This patch fixes it. This bug
> dates back to at least kernel 2.6.12.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/i387.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
> index 202d24f..5d576ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void mxcsr_feature_mask_init(void)
>
> if (cpu_has_fxsr) {
> memset(&fx_scratch, 0, sizeof(struct i387_fxsave_struct));
> - asm volatile("fxsave %0" : : "m" (fx_scratch));
> + asm volatile("fxsave %0" : "+m" (fx_scratch));
> mask = fx_scratch.mxcsr_mask;
> if (mask == 0)
> mask = 0x0000ffbf;
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tip-eaa5a990191d204ba0f9d35dbe5505ec2cdd1460@git.kernel.org>
2013-07-26 20:19 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-07-26 20:25 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, fpu: correct the asm constraints for fxsave , unbreak mxcsr.daz Greg KH
2013-07-26 21:36 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F2D9D2.8050405@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox