[PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Huacai Chen]

In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
so correct it.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
---
 include/linux/stmmac.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h
index f1054b9c2d8a..1ba583ef6e03 100644
--- a/include/linux/stmmac.h
+++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h
@@ -28,14 +28,14 @@
  * This could also be configured at run time using CPU freq framework. */
 
 /* MDC Clock Selection define*/
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_60_100M	0x0	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/42 */
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_100_150M	0x1	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/62 */
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_20_35M	0x2	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/16 */
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_35_60M	0x3	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/26 */
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_150_250M	0x4	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/102 */
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_250_300M	0x5	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/124 */
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_300_500M	0x6	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/204 */
-#define	STMMAC_CSR_500_800M	0x7	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/324 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_60_100M	0x0	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/42 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_100_150M	0x1	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/62 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_20_35M	0x2	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/16 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_35_60M	0x3	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/26 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_150_250M	0x4	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/102 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_250_300M	0x5	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/124 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_300_500M	0x6	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/204 */
+#define	STMMAC_CSR_500_800M	0x7	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/324 */
 
 /* MTL algorithms identifiers */
 #define MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_WRR	0x0
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Yao Zi]

On Sun, Feb 01, 2026 at 10:36:19AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
> so correct it.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> ---
>  include/linux/stmmac.h | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> index f1054b9c2d8a..1ba583ef6e03 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stmmac.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> @@ -28,14 +28,14 @@
>   * This could also be configured at run time using CPU freq framework. */
>  
>  /* MDC Clock Selection define*/
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_60_100M	0x0	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/42 */
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_100_150M	0x1	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/62 */
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_20_35M	0x2	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/16 */
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_35_60M	0x3	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/26 */
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_150_250M	0x4	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/102 */
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_250_300M	0x5	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/124 */
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_300_500M	0x6	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/204 */
> -#define	STMMAC_CSR_500_800M	0x7	/* MDC = clk_scr_i/324 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_60_100M	0x0	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/42 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_100_150M	0x1	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/62 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_20_35M	0x2	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/16 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_35_60M	0x3	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/26 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_150_250M	0x4	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/102 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_250_300M	0x5	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/124 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_300_500M	0x6	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/204 */
> +#define	STMMAC_CSR_500_800M	0x7	/* MDC = clk_csr_i/324 */

This seems only a fix to typo in comments, instead of real functionality
bugs, should this be backported?

> It must either fix a real bug that bothers people or just add a device
> ID. To elaborate on the former:
> ...
> - No “trivial” fixes without benefit for users (spelling changes,
>   whitespace cleanups, etc).[1]

>  /* MTL algorithms identifiers */
>  #define MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_WRR	0x0
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
> 

Regards,
Yao Zi

[1]: https://docs.kernel.org/6.15/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Huacai Chen]

On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 12:44 PM Yao Zi <me@ziyao.cc> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2026 at 10:36:19AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
> > so correct it.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/stmmac.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> > index f1054b9c2d8a..1ba583ef6e03 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/stmmac.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> > @@ -28,14 +28,14 @@
> >   * This could also be configured at run time using CPU freq framework. */
> >
> >  /* MDC Clock Selection define*/
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_60_100M      0x0     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/42 */
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_100_150M     0x1     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/62 */
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_20_35M       0x2     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/16 */
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_35_60M       0x3     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/26 */
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_150_250M     0x4     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/102 */
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_250_300M     0x5     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/124 */
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_300_500M     0x6     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/204 */
> > -#define      STMMAC_CSR_500_800M     0x7     /* MDC = clk_scr_i/324 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_60_100M      0x0     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/42 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_100_150M     0x1     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/62 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_20_35M       0x2     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/16 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_35_60M       0x3     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/26 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_150_250M     0x4     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/102 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_250_300M     0x5     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/124 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_300_500M     0x6     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/204 */
> > +#define      STMMAC_CSR_500_800M     0x7     /* MDC = clk_csr_i/324 */
>
> This seems only a fix to typo in comments, instead of real functionality
> bugs, should this be backported?
I think it is worthy, but the maintainer is free to remove "Cc stable".

Huacai

>
> > It must either fix a real bug that bothers people or just add a device
> > ID. To elaborate on the former:
> > ...
> > - No “trivial” fixes without benefit for users (spelling changes,
> >   whitespace cleanups, etc).[1]
>
> >  /* MTL algorithms identifiers */
> >  #define MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_WRR 0x0
> > --
> > 2.47.3
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Yao Zi
>
> [1]: https://docs.kernel.org/6.15/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
>

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Yanteng Si]

在 2026/2/1 10:36, Huacai Chen 写道:
> In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
> so correct it.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

fix tag?

But this is just a comment, no need to backport it (I'm fine either way).

If no fix tag, please update the subject to typo fix instead.


Thanks,

Yanteng

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Huacai Chen]

On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 9:36 AM Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2026/2/1 10:36, Huacai Chen 写道:
> > In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
> > so correct it.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
>
> fix tag?
>
> But this is just a comment, no need to backport it (I'm fine either way).
>
> If no fix tag, please update the subject to typo fix instead.
Why? Is the subject line wrong?

Huacai

>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yanteng
>
>
>

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Yanteng Si]

在 2026/2/2 15:29, Huacai Chen 写道:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 9:36 AM Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2026/2/1 10:36, Huacai Chen 写道:
>>> In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
>>> so correct it.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
>> fix tag?
>>
>> But this is just a comment, no need to backport it (I'm fine either way).
>>
>> If no fix tag, please update the subject to typo fix instead.
> Why? Is the subject line wrong?

You're absolutely right, and "typo" specifically refers to a typographical

error in written content—this patch is a correction to a comment, so using

"typo" is perfectly appropriate.


I might be misinterpreting the wording here – what I really want is to tell

exactly what a patch modifies from the subject alone, without having to

check the patch content. Maybe "correct comment" is a better fit. I know

I'm splitting hairs a bit, but I couldn't just stay silent after receiving your

patch, right?


Thanks,

Yanteng

>
> Huacai
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yanteng
>>
>>
>>

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Sun,  1 Feb 2026 10:36:19 +0800 Huacai Chen wrote:
> In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
> so correct it.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

The CC stable is unnecessary, please repost without it.
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Correct spelling from clk_scr_i to clk_csr_i

[Huacai Chen]

On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 8:07 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun,  1 Feb 2026 10:36:19 +0800 Huacai Chen wrote:
> > In include/linux/stmmac.h clk_csr_i is spelled as clk_scr_i by mistake,
> > so correct it.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
>
> The CC stable is unnecessary, please repost without it.
OK, will do.

Huacai
> --
> pw-bot: cr