From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <52E1F750.7030604@roeck-us.net> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:17:04 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review References: <20140123190648.720195687@linuxfoundation.org> <20140123232030.GA31674@roeck-us.net> <20140124041135.GD25507@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20140124041135.GD25507@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/23/2014 08:11 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:20:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. >>> There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >> Build test looks good: >> total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0 >> >> Note that I added several individual build tests for arm but dropped >> arm:allmodconfig. Background is that arm:allmodconfig is quite notoriously >> broken nowadays, and it doesn't make much sense to keep testing it. > > It's broken? I thought it had been building fine for a while now? > In mainline, yes. Or at least it was when I dropped it, and I gave up on it. Guenter