From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-id: <53060590.9090600@samsung.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:39:28 -0700 From: Shuah Khan Reply-to: shuah.kh@samsung.com MIME-version: 1.0 To: Xishi Qiu Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/26] 3.10.31-stable review References: <20140218224530.398913499@linuxfoundation.org> <53054C83.8000409@samsung.com> <5305AF24.4030503@huawei.com> In-reply-to: <5305AF24.4030503@huawei.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/20/2014 12:30 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote: > On 2014/2/20 8:29, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 02/18/2014 03:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.31 release. >>> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Thu Feb 20 22:45:20 UTC 2014. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.31-rc1.gz >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >> >> Compile and boot tests passed on AMD system. Boot failed on Intel systems. I think the following changes are the suspect, so far by process of elimination - these two aren't in 3.12 and 3.13 >> >> # modified: mm/hugetlb.c >> # modified: mm/memory-failure.c >> >> However, my strong suspect is the following: >> >> Xishi Qiu >> mm: fix process accidentally killed by mce because of huge page migration >> >> I don't see how this could cause problems, none the less, I will test without these changes and let you know. >> >> >> Naoya Horiguchi >> mm/memory-failure.c: fix memory leak in successful soft offlining >> >> I will test without these changes and let you know. >> >> -- Shuah >> > > Hi Shuah > > I tested on my system, it boot successfully. > > hardware: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2420 0 @ 1.90GHz > OS: v3.10.30 + the two patches > > Thanks, > Xishi Qiu Xishi, I tested without your patch and still see the issue. My wild guess wasn't a good one :) I am starting git bisect now. -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658