From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Willis Kung <williskung@google.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"# v4 . 10+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Correct pkru/xstate inconsistency
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:55:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <543efc25-9b99-53cd-e305-d8b4d917b64b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADyq12x2sd4hrfX9XeG7pCbJx8ZHGb9FZo=9G1BavkrAUX7r-g@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/15/22 09:50, Brian Geffon wrote:
>>> is not a kernel thread as kernel threads will never use PKRU. It's
>>> possible that this_cpu_read_stable() on current_task (ie.
>>> get_current()) is returning an old cached value. By forcing the read
>>> with this_cpu_read() the correct task is used. Without this it's
>>> possible when switching from a kernel thread to a userspace thread
>>> that we'll still observe the PF_KTHREAD flag and never restore the
>>> PKRU. And as a result this issue only occurs when switching from a
>>> kernel thread to a userspace thread, switching from a non kernel
>>> thread works perfectly fine because all we consider in that situation
>>> is the flags from some other non kernel task and the next fpu is
>>> passed in to switch_fpu_finish().
>>
>> It makes *sense* that there would be a place in the context switch code
>> where 'current' is wonky, but I never realized this. This seems really
>> fragile, but *also* trivially detectable.
>>
>> Is the PKRU code really the only code to use 'current' in a buggy way
>> like this?
>
> Yes, because the remaining code in __switch_to() references the next
> task as next_p rather than current. Technically, it might be more
> correct to pass next_p to switch_fpu_finish(), what do you think? This
> may make sense since we're also passing the next fpu anyway.
Yeah, passing next_p instead of next_fpu makes a lot of sense to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 15:36 [PATCH] x86/fpu: Correct pkru/xstate inconsistency Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 15:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-15 16:19 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 17:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-15 17:10 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-15 16:20 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 17:07 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-15 17:50 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 17:55 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-02-15 19:22 ` [PATCH stable 5.4,5.10] " Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 19:44 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 21:32 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 21:42 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-15 21:48 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-16 2:01 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-16 10:05 ` Greg KH
2022-02-16 10:05 ` Greg KH
2022-02-16 15:14 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-16 15:16 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-17 13:31 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-17 16:44 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-17 20:42 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-24 15:16 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-25 12:01 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 21:14 ` [PATCH] " Guenter Roeck
2022-02-15 21:36 ` Brian Geffon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=543efc25-9b99-53cd-e305-d8b4d917b64b@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=groeck@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williskung@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox