From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <5474D86E.6020608@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:28:46 -0500 From: Boris Ostrovsky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Richard Hendershot , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17 100/141] x86, microcode: Fix accessing dis_ucode_ldr on 32-bit References: <20141119205150.700188369@linuxfoundation.org> <20141119205153.916605840@linuxfoundation.org> <5474C67A.7040200@oracle.com> <20141125182410.GB4128@pd.tnic> <5474CDCE.6040000@oracle.com> <20141125184351.GC4128@pd.tnic> <5474D0A1.2020600@oracle.com> <20141125190849.GF4128@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20141125190849.GF4128@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/25/2014 02:08 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:55:29PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 11/25/2014 01:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:43:26PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>> I don't think this routine is called on PV. >>> They're either both called or none is. At least on baremetal, that is. >>> >> PV guests don't start with startup_32. >> >> We are coming from a resume into load_ucode_ap as: > Btw, why is this thing even running on xen? I'd like to make > CONFIG_MICROCODE depend on !PARAVIRT and be done with it. You'd have to decide at runtime --- many baremetal systems are compiled with PARAVIRT. -boris