From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <5488CE4D.1000606@nod.at>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:50:53 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kenton Varda <kenton@sandstorm.io>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series?
References: <CALCETrXWx2-ZejEHmOi7aSoF-qJMRGR5yseeMhuurZwJRrQbUg@mail.gmail.com> <87h9x5re41.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6xpzb0.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <CALCETrU-o5mPr1jCaLXDuuF6J2N470zAtx=8Fa-SjF=ZpdE8mQ@mail.gmail.com> <87ppbtn4mv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <CALCETrXSScp77BUJR5NSTh5-RnEZ9rqELSGJBeEzgdQ-OtohuQ@mail.gmail.com> <87a92xn2io.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87r3w8liw4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87iohklfvj.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6vh31e.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20141210224822.GG20012@ubuntumail>
In-Reply-To: <20141210224822.GG20012@ubuntumail>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

Am 10.12.2014 um 23:48 schrieb Serge Hallyn:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
>>
>> Will people please test these patches with their container project?
>>
>> These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if
>> I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it.  I
>> really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks
>> userspace again.
>>
>> The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for
>> /proc/<pid>/setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the
>> functionality of the patchset.
>>
>> With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily
>> reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP.
>>
>> Eric
> 
> Is there a git tree we can clone?

I was about to ask that too.
Hopefully I can tomorrow find some time for testing.

Thanks,
//richard