On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 11:33:45AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 3/24/26 6:25 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:38:36PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:

> >> -	if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
> >> +	if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK && dai_data->graph[dai->id] == NULL) {

> > This is an array of APM_PORT_MAX elements but we have DAI IDs in the DT
> > bindings over that and now we're using the DAI ID to index into the

> The driver has dai->id indexing the array in most places, and that is
> how it has been for a while. This is one of the problem which last patch
> is trying to address doing a check on the range. At somepoint we need to
> move to dynamic allocation tbh.

Yeah, I saw it was a bit shaky all over.  I think having the array size
bumps earlier might help at least make it clearer things are OK, but
dynamic structures of some kind would indeed be ideal.