From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CE23E0235 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774370987; cv=none; b=puqJpRg6WO4bTwXLL2IE/jOGlhY1AhvQCj63JuyRKmsAvJSMsmjUvYG3ljor0gyyQk4EGzodSEFX4E1muA2lKBqhx6FVEjc3IJW3f4p1Uq4sYMfYWJcKXQIkFyOoDiaJq0h4MTgFWGH2z/4R60giVvCbIL6gMVTcGb0bedNoprE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774370987; c=relaxed/simple; bh=41Qf05O8U1obBYOSOWvATaYc2cpdkTfjUa6W0IdTaRs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pWybb4HnON2llA4JHzpyj+PDc8sJIzB5qVI8HUvRVTLT7G2ciaYH1maXFGXTj3WEMWavc7dOZ50R2aORnuKRpA+joQ4Zyhrwhg+iYGLxQ8eQsf+g3zAOAlO5BqGGNggMViPQUHbeMjeircqmXTCM1o7P0iOBl9AnMp8rZK4rJI0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aNwwjNGI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aNwwjNGI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774370986; x=1805906986; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=41Qf05O8U1obBYOSOWvATaYc2cpdkTfjUa6W0IdTaRs=; b=aNwwjNGI9vnJmHMOTZJPirjxEgT72mn8/wQSqncWKMcN7Y/xAjmeth+t EkQ1PHr6J04tPPm1BluS5FGUvZYgbMP7p0l8w9XKDBd9w7VqGi7xcd/z3 oyW3wNnObUwoDROhuZHePZzyogMic0RSxrDYfCPwUsuUsXch65N7kZOov QPu1p92zF1sc58oUZ3OO/KQAhryU1vKpeWDxhx8se4SOSMjKP0lk4xZJI qfKlk9H5Q2Vb50xhhzcOK69XTNL7cCMPbi9N1QIfEbFvkU9xG23dVmepO 3uXSn3YhcP6RK+nI3UDWZYqzuhl0KVTo85/4sT4lJHdxpIw7zlTBl1m21 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iAWWNQlXTkuwS1zj1pXO6A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Yr6ErXS7RZW1ksn/+thP+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11739"; a="85707722" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,138,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="85707722" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2026 09:49:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2l1lXzMjR9q3OcXuyNsh7g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: y8c3fbXkRPeZsszVwV/YOw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,138,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="221059748" Received: from jdoman-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.125.110.6]) ([10.125.110.6]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2026 09:49:44 -0700 Message-ID: <551037c4-665e-4701-9689-a75bdabe4211@intel.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:49:43 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.19 378/378] cxl/acpi: Fix CXL_ACPI and CXL_PMEM Kconfig tristate mismatch To: Keith Busch , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Jonathan Cameron , Dan Williams References: <20260317163006.959177102@linuxfoundation.org> <20260317163020.886316423@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Dave Jiang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/24/26 9:45 AM, Keith Busch wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 05:35:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> 6.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > No objection, but a little confused how this got to stable before > landing in Linus' tree. Does stable pull directly from downstream > subsystems now? > > Speaking of upstream, will the CXL maintainers be submitting a pull > request for the staged fixes soon? I'm just getting new bug reports from > people testing 7.0-rc, so wanted to check in on that. I can send it today. Looks like I got enough days in linux-next soaking for the PR.