From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <552302FA.3090804@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:04:42 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , kvm list , Marcelo Tosatti , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: vdso: fix pvclock races with task migration References: <1428000263-11892-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <5522E789.6070804@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <5522E789.6070804@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/04/2015 22:07, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On 04/02/2015 11:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Radim Krčmář wrote: >>> If we were migrated right after __getcpu, but before reading the >>> migration_count, we wouldn't notice that we read TSC of a different >>> VCPU, nor that KVM's bug made pvti invalid, as only migration_count >>> on source VCPU is increased. >>> >>> Change vdso instead of updating migration_count on destination. >> >> Looks good to me. > > Just to check: what tree is this intended to go through? I can take it, > but not until the previous patch makes it into Linus' tree or -tip. Or > I can take both patches. I'll take it for 4.1. Paolo