From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <55272B50.80809@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:45:52 +0800 From: Zefan Li MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Borntraeger CC: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 033/176] KVM: s390: flush CPU on load control References: <1428569028-23762-1-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org> <1428569224-23820-33-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org> <552651A0.1040302@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <552651A0.1040302@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2015/4/9 18:17, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am 09.04.2015 um 10:44 schrieb lizf@kernel.org: >> From: Christian Borntraeger >> >> 3.4.107-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> >> ------------------ >> >> >> commit 2dca485f8740208604543c3960be31a5dd3ea603 upstream. > > Hmmm, I just realized that this patch only makes a difference with > > commit d3d692c82e4ed79ae7c85f8825ccfdb7d11819da ("KVM: s390: implement KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH and make use of it") > > It should not hurt to have this patch as far as I can tell, > but it makes no difference. This is also true for other > stable versions < 3.18 - sorry for noticing it that late. > > commit d3d692c82e4ed79ae7c85f8825ccfdb7d11819da on the other hand > is not that easy to backport into Linux versions < 3.16. > > So maybe just drop this patch? > I'll drop this one. Thanks for your review!