From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <55325EBD.3070303@roeck-us.net> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:40:13 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/34] 3.10.75-stable review References: <20150417132553.751904098@linuxfoundation.org> <20150417200010.GB9538@roeck-us.net> <20150418090206.GA30040@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20150418090206.GA30040@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/18/2015 02:02 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:00:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:28:32PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.75 release. >>> There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun Apr 19 13:25:20 UTC 2015. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >> Build results: >> total: 125 pass: 124 fail: 1 >> Failed builds: >> arm64:allmodconfig >> >> Qemu test results: >> total: 27 pass: 27 fail: 0 >> >> arm64:allmodconfig was added to the list of builds only recently; >> the build failure is not new. Results are as expected. > > Hm, any hint on how I can solve the build failure. It's in my nature to > not want any failures :) > Hi Greg, I can give it a shot for 3.14. 3.10 may be too difficult. I'll let you know. Guenter