From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:54808 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751194AbbECVcR (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 May 2015 17:32:17 -0400 Received: from mailnull by bh-25.webhostbox.net with sa-checked (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Yp1Ul-0047zh-GM for stable@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 21:32:15 +0000 Message-ID: <554693DD.6090208@roeck-us.net> Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 14:32:13 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review References: <20150502190119.666291882@linuxfoundation.org> <55467E74.8050600@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <55467E74.8050600@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/03/2015 01:00 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Build error: > > net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c: In function 'cgroup_mt': > net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c:42:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'sk_fullsock' > > 3.19.y and 4.0.y are being rebuilt right mow, so maybe you fixed that > problem as well as the same failure in 4.0.y. I'll resend my report for 3.19.y > and wait with the report for 4.0.y until after the rebuild is complete. > Another build failure, affecting powerpc:defconfig and powerpc:allmodconfig builds for 4.0.y and 3.19.y (and it looks like it is still there). Error log: include/linux/bug.h: Assembler messages: include/linux/bug.h:7: Error: unrecognized opcode: `enum' include/linux/bug.h:8: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,' include/linux/bug.h:9: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,' [ and many more similar messages ] Bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label: Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'. After reverting the patch in 4.0.y, the files affected by it still compile, so I don't entirely understand why this patch would be needed in -stable. Guenter