From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:34765 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752706AbbEGLZu (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 07:25:50 -0400 Received: from mailnull by bh-25.webhostbox.net with sa-checked (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YqJw5-0029hM-Ml for stable@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 11:25:49 +0000 Message-ID: <554B4BB6.2040302@roeck-us.net> Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 04:25:42 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tyler Baker , Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton , shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, Mike Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review References: <20150502190119.666291882@linuxfoundation.org> <20150505221038.GB22408@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/06/2015 10:25 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 5 May 2015 at 15:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. >>> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >> >> -rc2 is out now that should work properly: >> >> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz > > The kernelci.org robot reported new boot failures in v3.19.7 on a > variety of at91 boards[1][2][3]. I instructed the robot perform a boot > bisection which yielded... > Can one of those boards be emulated with qemu, by any chance ? Guenter