From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: v1ron@mail.ru, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: ALSA: oxygen stable commit difference
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 22:40:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555659D6.8090601@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55560015.9080604@suse.cz>
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> This:
> commit 1f91ecc14deea9461aca93273d78871ec4d98fcd
> Author: Roman Volkov <v1ron@mail.ru>
> Date: Fri Jan 24 16:18:11 2014 +0400
>
> ALSA: oxygen: modify adjust_dg_dac_routing function
>
> was merged in 3.14 and was also put to several stable trees back in
> early 2014. But the commit in stable trees is totally different to
> what is in upstream.
>
> 1) why is it a totally different diff?
The upstream commit was part of a larger reorganization and depended on
lots of earlier changes. The OXYGEN_PLAY_MUTE* changes are the correct
backport for the old driver; the OXYGEN_PLAY_DACx_SOURCE* changes would
have been meaningless in the old driver.
It was an error to not mention this in the stable commit message.
> 2) do we need the one below, which is marked as "Fixes" the above?
>
> commit 305564413c99514a14a49215790d96b8d71a6295
> Author: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
> Date: Tue Mar 18 09:31:18 2014 +0100
>
> ALSA: oxygen: Xonar DG(X): fix Stereo Upmixing regression
This reverts exactly those parts that were not backported to -stable,
so it must not (and cannot) be applied to -stable.
Regards,
Clemens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-15 14:17 ALSA: oxygen stable commit difference Jiri Slaby
2015-05-15 20:40 ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2015-05-15 22:18 ` Roman Volkov
2015-05-16 7:17 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555659D6.8090601@ladisch.de \
--to=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=v1ron@mail.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox