stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Thomas D <whissi@whissi.de>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v3.14.y 3/6] x86/nmi/64: Switch stacks on userspace NMI entry
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:45:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D35304.8050000@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439852125-6581-4-git-send-email-whissi@whissi.de>

On 08/18/2015, 12:55 AM, Thomas D wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> 
> commit 9b6e6a8334d56354853f9c255d1395c2ba570e0a upstream.
> 
> Returning to userspace is tricky: IRET can fail, and ESPFIX can
> rearrange the stack prior to IRET.
> 
> The NMI nesting fixup relies on a precise stack layout and
> atomic IRET.  Rather than trying to teach the NMI nesting fixup
> to handle ESPFIX and failed IRET, punt: run NMIs that came from
> user mode on the normal kernel stack.
> 
> This will make some nested NMIs visible to C code, but the C
> code is okay with that.
> 
> As a side effect, this should speed up perf: it eliminates an
> RDMSR when NMIs come from user mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 28b08345..bd7d8aa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -1715,19 +1715,88 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
>  	 * a nested NMI that updated the copy interrupt stack frame, a
>  	 * jump will be made to the repeat_nmi code that will handle the second
>  	 * NMI.
> +	 *
> +	 * However, espfix prevents us from directly returning to userspace
> +	 * with a single IRET instruction.  Similarly, IRET to user mode
> +	 * can fault.  We therefore handle NMIs from user space like
> +	 * other IST entries.
>  	 */
>  
>  	/* Use %rdx as out temp variable throughout */
>  	pushq_cfi %rdx
>  	CFI_REL_OFFSET rdx, 0
>  
> +	testb	$3, CS-RIP+8(%rsp)
> +	jz	.Lnmi_from_kernel
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * NMI from user mode.  We need to run on the thread stack, but we
> +	 * can't go through the normal entry paths: NMIs are masked, and
> +	 * we don't want to enable interrupts, because then we'll end
> +	 * up in an awkward situation in which IRQs are on but NMIs
> +	 * are off.
> +	 */
> +
> +	SWAPGS
> +	cld
> +	movq	%rsp, %rdx
> +	movq	PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack), %rsp

I think you are wasting stack space here. With kernel_stack, you should
add 5*8 (KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET) to the pointer here. I.e. space for 5
registers is pre-reserved at kernel_stack already. (Or use movq instead
of the 5 pushq below.)

Why don't you re-use the 3.16's version anyway?

> +	pushq	5*8(%rdx)	/* pt_regs->ss */
> +	pushq	4*8(%rdx)	/* pt_regs->rsp */
> +	pushq	3*8(%rdx)	/* pt_regs->flags */
> +	pushq	2*8(%rdx)	/* pt_regs->cs */
> +	pushq	1*8(%rdx)	/* pt_regs->rip */
> +	pushq   $-1		/* pt_regs->orig_ax */
> +	pushq   %rdi		/* pt_regs->di */
> +	pushq   %rsi		/* pt_regs->si */
> +	pushq   (%rdx)		/* pt_regs->dx */
> +	pushq   %rcx		/* pt_regs->cx */
> +	pushq   %rax		/* pt_regs->ax */
> +	pushq   %r8		/* pt_regs->r8 */
> +	pushq   %r9		/* pt_regs->r9 */
> +	pushq   %r10		/* pt_regs->r10 */
> +	pushq   %r11		/* pt_regs->r11 */
> +	pushq	%rbx		/* pt_regs->rbx */
> +	pushq	%rbp		/* pt_regs->rbp */
> +	pushq	%r12		/* pt_regs->r12 */
> +	pushq	%r13		/* pt_regs->r13 */
> +	pushq	%r14		/* pt_regs->r14 */
> +	pushq	%r15		/* pt_regs->r15 */

regards,
-- 
js
suse labs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-18 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-17 10:39 Request for stable 3.18.y and 3.14.y inclusion: Fix for CVE-2015-3290 (nmi) Thomas D.
2015-08-17 13:23 ` Greg KH
2015-08-17 22:55   ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55     ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 1/6] x86/nmi: Enable nested do_nmi() handling for 64-bit kernels Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55     ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 2/6] x86/nmi/64: Remove asm code that saves CR2 Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55     ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 3/6] x86/nmi/64: Switch stacks on userspace NMI entry Thomas D
2015-08-18 15:45       ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2015-08-18 17:12         ` Thomas D.
2015-08-18 19:32           ` Jiri Slaby
2015-08-19 14:11             ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11               ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 1/6] x86/nmi: Enable nested do_nmi() handling for 64-bit kernels Thomas D
2015-09-29 13:38                 ` Greg KH
2015-08-19 14:11               ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 2/6] x86/nmi/64: Remove asm code that saves CR2 Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11               ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 3/6] x86/nmi/64: Switch stacks on userspace NMI entry Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11               ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 4/6] x86/nmi/64: Improve nested NMI comments Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11               ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 5/6] x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11               ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 6/6] x86/nmi/64: Use DF to avoid userspace RSP confusing nested NMI detection Thomas D
2015-09-29 14:11               ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Greg KH
2015-08-17 22:55     ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 4/6] x86/nmi/64: Improve nested NMI comments Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55     ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 5/6] x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55     ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 6/6] x86/nmi/64: Use DF to avoid userspace RSP confusing nested NMI detection Thomas D

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55D35304.8050000@suse.cz \
    --to=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=whissi@whissi.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).