From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail1.ugh.no ([178.79.162.34]:47502 "EHLO mail1.ugh.no"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S934662AbbI2Ksp (ORCPT <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:48:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in
 process_backlog
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20150926205313.363686083@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20150926205320.865002695@linuxfoundation.org> <5609F377.2090905@tomt.net>
 <alpine.LFD.2.11.1509290957130.2072@ja.home.ssi.bg>
 <560A4E3A.2080104@tomt.net> <560A661C.7000406@tomt.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com
From: Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net>
Message-ID: <560A6C8B.7080105@tomt.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:48:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <560A661C.7000406@tomt.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On 29. sep. 2015 12:21, Andre Tomt wrote:
> Meanwhile I'll revert both the mentioned net patches and see how it goes.

So that blew up as well, meaning it's not any of these two patches:
[PATCH 4.1 124/159] net: do not process device backlog during unregistration
[PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog

I'll be offline for a half+ day, I'll look into bisecting when back if
nobody has figured it out by then.