Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pin the ifbdev for the info->system_base GGTT mmapping

[Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>]

On 10/08/2015 02:07 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:34:17AM -0700, Wayne Boyer wrote:
>> From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>
>> A long time ago (before 3.14) we relied on a permanent pinning of the
>> ifbdev to lock the fb in place inside the GGTT. However, the
>> introduction of stealing the BIOS framebuffer and reusing its address in
>> the GGTT for the fbdev has muddied waters and we use an inherited fb.
>> However, the inherited fb is only pinned whilst it is active and we no
>> longer have an explicit pin for the info->system_base mmapping used by
>> the fbdev. The result is that after some aperture pressure the fbdev may
>> be evicted, but we continue to write the fbcon into the same GGTT
>> address - overwriting anything else that may be put into that offset.
>> The effect is most pronounced across suspend/resume as
>> intel_fbdev_set_suspend() does a full clear over the whole scanout.
>>
>> v2: rebased on latest nightly (Wayne)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reviewed-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
>> index 6532912..c6aa4f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
>> @@ -215,6 +215,16 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>>  	obj = intel_fb->obj;
>>  	size = obj->base.size;
>>  
>> +	/* The fb constructor will have already pinned us (or inherited a
>> +	 * GGTT region from the BIOS) suitable for a scanout, so
>> +	 * this should just be a no-op and increment the pin count for the
>> +	 * fbdev mmapping. It does have a useful side-effect of validating
>> +	 * the pin for fbdev's use via a GGTT mmapping.
>> +	 */
>> +	ret = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(obj, NULL, 0, PIN_MAPPABLE);
> 
> This should be i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(obj, 0, PIN_MAPPABLE);
> At which point I just rage quit.

LOL GEM naming strikes again!

Jesse