From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:44606 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752008AbbJXBLR (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 21:11:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 00/46] 4.1.12-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Shuah Khan References: <20151023174620.779720995@linuxfoundation.org> <562A99F0.70208@osg.samsung.com> <20151023232218.GB13904@kroah.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <562ADAB1.4020400@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:11:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151023232218.GB13904@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/23/2015 04:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:34:56PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 10/23/2015 11:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.12 release. >>> There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun Oct 25 17:46:11 UTC 2015. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.1.12-rc1.gz >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >> >> I am seeing the following compile error (was seen in 4.2.4-rc1) >> >> In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0, >> from include/linux/stddef.h:4, >> from ./include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4, >> from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13, >> from include/linux/types.h:5, >> from include/uapi/linux/capability.h:16, >> from include/linux/capability.h:15, >> from include/linux/sched.h:15, >> from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12: >> drivers/xen/preempt.c: In function ‘xen_maybe_preempt_hcall’: >> drivers/xen/preempt.c:34:11: error: too few arguments to function >> ‘should_resched’ >> && should_resched())) { >> ^ >> include/linux/compiler.h:164:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’ >> # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) >> ^ >> In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:18:0, >> from include/linux/spinlock.h:50, >> from include/linux/seqlock.h:35, >> from include/linux/time.h:5, >> from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56, >> from include/linux/timex.h:56, >> from include/linux/sched.h:19, >> from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12: >> ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:93:29: note: declared here >> static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset) >> ^ >> scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'drivers/xen/preempt.o' failed >> make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/preempt.o] Error 1 >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'drivers/xen' failed >> make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2 >> Makefile:947: recipe for target 'drivers' failed >> make: *** [drivers] Error 2 > Also for powerpc: arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c: In function 'kvmppc_run_vcpu': arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c:2181:3: error: too few arguments to function 'should_resched' [ Didn't we have that before ? ] Guenter