From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:32836 "EHLO mail-pf0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933565AbbLOPPN (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:15:13 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id n128so6283135pfn.0 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:15:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.3] vrf: Fix memory leak on registration failure in vrf_newlink() To: Ben Hutchings , Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20151215151243.GN28542@decadent.org.uk> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov , "David S. Miller" From: David Ahern Message-ID: <56702E7E.5000604@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:15:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151215151243.GN28542@decadent.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/15/15 8:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > @@ -598,7 +599,10 @@ static int vrf_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev, > > rcu_assign_pointer(dev->vrf_ptr, vrf_ptr); > > - return register_netdev(dev); > + err = register_netdev(dev); > + if (err) > + kfree(vrf_ptr); > + return err; > } > > static size_t vrf_nl_getsize(const struct net_device *dev) > The rcu_assign_pointer should only be done if the register_netdev succeeded. Thanks for creating the patch.