From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/39] 3.12.53-stable review To: Guenter Roeck , stable@vger.kernel.org References: <56A6361B.6020508@roeck-us.net> Cc: William Dauchy , shuah.kh@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" From: Jiri Slaby Message-ID: <56A639CE.9010507@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:05:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56A6361B.6020508@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/25/2016, 03:50 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/25/2016 03:49 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.53 release. >> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Wed Jan 27 12:44:04 CET 2016. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> > > Early feedback: m68k builds fail due to 'm68k: handle > pgtable_page_ctor() fail', > which would also require upstream commit 390f44e2aa2ab ("mm: allow > pgtable_page_ctor() to fail"). I noticed and pushed a fixed tree without that commit :). > However, that commit alone doesn't add > any value; > it requires additional commits to make sense. I don't know what those are. > Copying Kirill for advice. It needs the later rewrite where the function can actually fail. thanks, -- js suse labs