From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: Build failures in v3.10-stable-queue, v3.14-stable-queue (+4.1, 4.3, 4.4)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:49:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AA389A.3080108@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127174936.GA22700@kroah.com>
On 27/01/16 17:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:16:12AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 01/27/2016 08:34 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 01/27/2016 04:22 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> mn10300 (v3.10, v3.14):
>>>>
>>>> kernel/uid16.c:19:1: error: unknown type name 'old_uid_t'
>>>> kernel/uid16.c:19:1: error: unknown type name 'old_gid_t'
>>>> ipc/util.c:609:2: error: 'old_uid_t' undeclared
>>>>
>>>> and other similar errors. Requires c86576ea114a ("mn10300: Select CONFIG_HAVE_UID16
>>>> to fix build failure"). Results in minor easy to resolve conflict in v3.10.y (I didn't
>>>> check v3.14.y). Let me know if you need a backport.
>>>>
>>> 4.1 and 4.3 are also affected by this problem.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> arm64 (4.1, 4.3):
>>>
>>> allmodconfig core dumps (oops). I'll need to look into that one.
>>>
>>
>> Two patches are culprits here:
>>
>> - 'recordmcount: arm64: Replace the ignored mcount call into nop' causes the crash.
>> It is not the C compiler. Maybe some other patch to recordmcount is missing.
>>
This bug is due the endianness mix at-least in my build setup and commit
c84da8b9ad37 ("recordmcount: Fix endianness handling bug for
nop_mcount") seems to fix it for me.
It's already marked for stable and I see that there are quite a few
patches queued for stable in scripts/recordmcount.[ch]. But I see Greg
has already pointed this out in the NOTE in his initial "[PATCH 4.1
000/127] 4.1.17-stable review" email.
>> - 'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODATA' uses SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE
>> which is not defined in 4.3. This causes a build failure in 4.3 after reverting the above.
>> I didn't check 4.1.
Ardb already posted a fix for this [1]
>
> Ok, as I have no idea here, and don't have an arm64 system to do
> anything with (i.e. test), I'll just leave this alone until someone who
> does care about the architecture comes along with a fix :)
>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8147861/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 12:22 Build failures in v3.10-stable-queue, v3.14-stable-queue Guenter Roeck
2016-01-27 12:31 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-27 17:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-01-27 13:27 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-01-27 15:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-01-27 16:34 ` Build failures in v3.10-stable-queue, v3.14-stable-queue (+4.1, 4.3, 4.4) Guenter Roeck
2016-01-27 16:37 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-27 17:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-01-27 17:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-01-28 9:38 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 15:49 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-01-31 19:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-01-27 17:20 ` Build failures in v3.10-stable-queue, v3.14-stable-queue Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-01-27 17:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56AA389A.3080108@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).