From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
lwn@lwn.net, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request from pty_write [was: Linux 4.4.2]
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:52:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D090CA.7050508@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D01331.5030401@suse.cz>
On 02/26/2016 12:56 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/26/2016, 01:38 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> Interestingly, RBP contains address inside try_to_wake_up --
>>> ffffffff810a535a (dunno why) which is:
>>> ffffffff810a5355: e8 66 a0 ff ff callq ffffffff8109f3c0
>>> <ttwu_stat>
>>> ffffffff810a535a: e9 9d fe ff ff jmpq ffffffff810a51fc
>>> <try_to_wake_up+0x3c>
>>>
>>> ttwu_stat does in the begginning:
>>> mov $0x16e80,%r14
>>>
>>> which is what we actually still have in r14 when it crashes. The first
>>> ttwu_stat's "if" has to go through the true branch (otherwise r14 would
>>> be overwritten).
>>
>> Hmm. That does sound very much like it might be ttwu_stat() that has
>> gotten the stack frame wrong, and when finishes exits, it does
>>
>> popq %rbp
>> ret
>>
>> but in fact it popped the return address, and then returned to a crazy address.
>>
>> Which sounds like a corrupted stack pointer (not a corrupted stack).
So more analysis would seem to confirm that RSP has been bumped +8
while in ttwu_stat() so when the epilog executed, register restore
was off by 1 qword. However, there's nothing in ttwu_stat() that
results in stack pointer offset by +1 qword from prolog.
Below I highlighted key instructions from try_to_wake_up() => ttwu_stat() and
what presumably was the resultant stack state at each instruction:
call try_to_wake_up ffffffff810a5585 \
push rbp ffff8800bb2a7c90 |
push r15 0000000000010e30 |
push r14 0000000000000005 |
push r13 ffff88017ed2a830 |- values from stack trace
push r12 ffff880234e26a08 |
push rbx ffff88017ee19f00 |
sub 0x10, rsp 000000008146e197 /
ffff88023fd40000 => rip @ crash
call raw_spin_lock_irqsave
mov rax, r13
mov 0x16e80, r15
mov 1, r12d
call ttwu_stat ffffffff810a535a => rbp @ crash
push rbp ffff8800bb2a7c80 => r15 @ crash
push r15 0000000000016e80 => r14 @ crash
push r14 ffff8800bb37e180 => r13 @ crash
push r13 0000000000000046 => r12 @ crash
push r12 0000000000000001 => rbx @ crash
push rbx ???
sub 8, rsp ???
So in addition to rbp <= ret addr and r15 <= saved rbp, note also
rbx <= saved r12 (== 1)
r12 <= saved r13 (rflags == 00046)
r14 <= saved r15 (== 0x16e80)
which neatly corresponds to the ttwu_stat() epilog if rsp has
been offset by +1 qword.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-26 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-17 20:37 Linux 4.4.2 Greg KH
2016-02-17 20:37 ` Greg KH
2016-02-25 10:12 ` BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request from pty_write [was: Linux 4.4.2] Jiri Slaby
2016-02-25 18:40 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-25 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-25 19:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-26 8:25 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-25 20:32 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-25 20:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-25 21:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-25 22:33 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-26 0:38 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-26 8:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26 0:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-26 8:56 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26 9:23 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26 9:50 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26 16:34 ` Greg KH
2016-02-26 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-29 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-26 17:52 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2016-02-25 21:43 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-25 22:00 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-02-26 8:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26 8:15 ` Jiri Slaby
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-26 18:05 Linus Torvalds
2016-02-26 18:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-26 18:18 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-26 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-26 19:59 ` Robert Święcki
2016-02-29 7:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-29 12:43 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D090CA.7050508@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwn@lwn.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).