From: Felipe Ferreri Tonello <eu@felipetonello.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "# v4 . 4+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_midi: added spinlock on transmit function
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:35:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DFEE5D.2070609@felipetonello.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874mcgglsh.fsf@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1881 bytes --]
Hi Balbi,
On 09/03/16 07:20, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> "Felipe F. Tonello" <eu@felipetonello.com> writes:
>> [ text/plain ]
>> Since f_midi_transmit is called by both ALSA and USB sub-systems, it can
>> potentially cause a race condition between both calls because f_midi_transmit
>> is not reentrant nor thread-safe. This is due to an implementation detail that
>> the transmit function looks for the next available usb request from the fifo
>> and only enqueues it if there is data to send, otherwise just re-uses it. So,
>> if both ALSA and USB frameworks calls this function at the same time,
>> kfifo_seek() will return the same usb_request, which will cause a race
>> condition.
>>
>> To solve this problem a syncronization mechanism is necessary. In this case it
>> is used a spinlock since f_midi_transmit is also called by usb_request->complete
>> callback in interrupt context.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
>
> this should be v4.5+
>
> $ git describe e1e3d7ec5da3
> v4.4-rc5-59-ge1e3d7ec5da3
>
>> @@ -651,17 +653,22 @@ static void f_midi_transmit(struct f_midi *midi)
>> {
>> struct usb_ep *ep = midi->in_ep;
>> int ret;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> /* We only care about USB requests if IN endpoint is enabled */
>> if (!ep || !ep->enabled)
>> goto drop_out;
>>
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&midi->transmit_lock, flags);
>> +
>> do {
>> ret = f_midi_do_transmit(midi, ep);
>
> you wrote this commit on top of 'next' right ? I know that because of
> this call to f_midi_do_transmit() here which is introduced by commit
> aac887442d5e ("usb: gadget: f_midi: move some of f_midi_transmit to
> separate func") which is not in Linus' tree yet.
>
> This prevents me from taking this patch during current -rc.
Yes, but then what should I do? Because if I patch on Linus' tree, then
the patch won't apply to your tree.
--
Felipe
[-- Attachment #2: 0x92698E6A.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 7195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 20:21 [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_midi: added spinlock on transmit function Felipe F. Tonello
2016-03-09 7:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-09 7:20 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-09 9:35 ` Felipe Ferreri Tonello [this message]
2016-03-09 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-09 16:15 ` Felipe Ferreri Tonello
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-09 16:17 Felipe F. Tonello
2016-03-09 16:58 ` Felipe Ferreri Tonello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DFEE5D.2070609@felipetonello.com \
--to=eu@felipetonello.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).