public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: alex.smith@imgtec.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com,
	"# v4 . 4+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: vdso: flush the vdso data page to update it on all processes
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:36:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FFA0C4.80601@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FC472B.1040801@hauke-m.de>

On 03/30/2016 11:37 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 05:21 PM, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
>> Hi Hauke,
>>
>> Could you share details of what version of glibc/rfs setup you are using?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am using the musl libc version 1.1.4 in OpenWrt. musl uses the same
> vdso code on arm and x86, it just needed some extensions to support the
> -ENOSYS return value which is not returned by the other architectures.
> 
> I removed the following patches from OpenWrt to activate vdso
> gettimeofday in kernel 4.4 again:
> target/linux/generic/patches-4.4/206-mips-disable-vdso.patch
> target/linux/generic/patches-4.4/340-MIPS-deactivate-gettimeofday-vdso.patch

I just tried vdso without this patch on a Broadcom BMIPS3300 V0.7 CPU in
the BCM4712 SoC and haven't seen any problems without this patch. With
the same number of patches applied to the kernel I have problems on the
34Kc CPU.

Hauke

> 
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> ZubairLK
>>
>> On 29/03/16 22:36, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2016 06:08 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>> Without flushing the vdso data page the vdso call is working on dated
>>>> or unsynced data. This resulted in problems where the clock_gettime
>>>> vdso call returned a time 6 seconds later after a 3 seconds sleep,
>>>> while the syscall reported a time 3 sounds later, like expected. This
>>>> happened very often and I got these ping results for example:
>>>>
>>>> root@OpenWrt:/# ping 192.168.1.255
>>>> PING 192.168.1.255 (192.168.1.255): 56 data bytes
>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.688 ms
>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=1 ttl=64 time=4294172.045 ms
>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=2 ttl=64 time=4293968.105 ms
>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=3 ttl=64 time=4294055.920 ms
>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=4 ttl=64 time=4294671.913 ms
>>>>
>>>> This was tested on a Lantiq/Intel VRX288 (MIPS BE 34Kc V5.6 CPU with
>>>> two VPEs)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
>>>
>>> This patch flushes the complete dcache of the CPU if cpu_has_dc_aliases
>>> is set.
>>>
>>> Calling flush_dcache_page(virt_to_page(&vdso_data)); improved the
>>> situation a litte bit but did not fix my problem.
>>>
>>> Could someone from Imagination please look into this problem. The page
>>> is linked into many virtual address spaces and when it gets modified by
>>> the kernel the user space processes are still accessing partly old data,
>>> even when lush_dcache_page() was called.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/mips/kernel/vdso.c | 6 ++++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> index 975e997..8b0d974 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>>>>   #include <linux/timekeeper_internal.h>
>>>>
>>>>   #include <asm/abi.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/page.h>
>>>>   #include <asm/vdso.h>
>>>>
>>>>   /* Kernel-provided data used by the VDSO. */
>>>> @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *tk)
>>>>       }
>>>>
>>>>       vdso_data_write_end(&vdso_data);
>>>> +    flush_cache_vmap((unsigned long)&vdso_data,
>>>> +             (unsigned long)&vdso_data + sizeof(vdso_data));
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   void update_vsyscall_tz(void)
>>>> @@ -93,6 +97,8 @@ void update_vsyscall_tz(void)
>>>>           vdso_data.tz_minuteswest = sys_tz.tz_minuteswest;
>>>>           vdso_data.tz_dsttime = sys_tz.tz_dsttime;
>>>>       }
>>>> +    flush_cache_vmap((unsigned long)&vdso_data,
>>>> +             (unsigned long)&vdso_data + sizeof(vdso_data));
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm, int
>>>> uses_interp)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-02 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-21 17:08 [PATCH v2] MIPS: vdso: flush the vdso data page to update it on all processes Hauke Mehrtens
2016-03-29 21:36 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2016-03-30 15:21   ` Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel
2016-03-30 21:37     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2016-04-02 10:36       ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2016-04-04 10:15         ` Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel
2016-04-04 11:03   ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FFA0C4.80601@hauke-m.de \
    --to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com \
    --cc=alex.smith@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox