Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1

[Yuki Machida <machida.yuki@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Hi Vladis,

 >> Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ?
 >
 > As mentioned in a message from Hans down this thread, it "fell through the cracks",
 > unfortunately. (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg99495.html)
I understand.
Thank you for you reply.

Regards,
Yuki Machida

On 2016年04月18日 18:20, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> Hello, Yuki, all,
>
>> Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ?
>
> As mentioned in a message from Hans down this thread, it "fell through the cracks",
> unfortunately. (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg99495.html)
>
> Best regards,
> Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | Product Security Engineer
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yuki Machida" <machida.yuki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> To: "Vladis Dronov" <vdronov@redhat.com>
> Cc: "sasha levin" <sasha.levin@oracle.com>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, oneukum@suse.com, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, ralf@spenneberg.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 10:32:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1
>
> Hi Vladis,
>
> On 2016年04月15日 18:55, Vladis Dronov wrote:
>> Hello, Yuki, all,
>>
>> My commit fa52bd506f resolves CVE-2015-7833, as mentioned in
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg96936.html
> I understand that commit fa52bd506f resolved security issue of CVE-2015-7833
> and commit 588afcc1 is not needed for fixing of CVE-2015-7833.
>
>> Please, note a message from Hans down this thread, who agrees
>> with my point.
> I understand the opinion of Vladis and Hans.
> Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ?
>
> Regards,
> Yuki Machida
>