From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mgwym03.jp.fujitsu.com ([211.128.242.42]:31394 "EHLO
	mgwym03.jp.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932393AbcFOIip (ORCPT
	<rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 04:38:45 -0400
Received: from m3051.s.css.fujitsu.com (m3051.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.134.21.209])
	by yt-mxq.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0562CAC012C
	for <stable@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:38:38 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: please back port a patch of warning fix to v4.1.y
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
References: <575FD492.5080006@jp.fujitsu.com> <57608234.1030801@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
From: Yuki Machida <machida.yuki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <5761140D.4010103@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:38:37 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57608234.1030801@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Sasha,

>> I conformed that v4.1.26 has a same warning using gcc 5.2.0.
>> Please apply following patch to 4.1.y.
>> 10fbd36e362a0f367e34a7cd876a81295d8fc5ca
> 
> Same as the other one, this looks like it just stops the warning rather
> than fix an actual bug, which means it's not really -stable material.

Thank you for advice.

I think that it is a patch for a warning fix, not actual bug fix.
Therefore, I want to cancel the request.

I will read stable_kernel_rules.txt again.

Thanks,
Yuki Machida