From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:41002 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752447AbcLEJxC (ORCPT <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Dec 2016 04:53:02 -0500
Message-ID: <584538CC.50807@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:52:12 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [stable:PATCH 0/3] PAN fixes backport for v4.4.35
References: <20161202164247.19496-1-james.morse@arm.com> <20161202172321.GA25426@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161202172321.GA25426@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Greg,

On 02/12/16 17:23, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:42:44PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
>> Hi linux-stable,
>>
>> This is the backport of the recent PAN fixes series for v4.4.35.
>> Original series:
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-October/461806.html
> 
> Why just 4.4-stable?  What about 4.8-stable?

Patch 1 doesn't backport easily. I was going to do v4.8 next, but thought one at
a time would be the least confusing...

(I don't seem to be very good at predicting what is confusing!)


Thanks,

James