Re: [PATCH wireless 4/4] wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix RCPI chain 3 mask in sta_poll RSSI extraction

[Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>]

On 4/7/26 09:58, Joshua Klinesmith wrote:
> On 4/7/26 12:31, Ben Greear wrote:
>> I am more concerned about the trickier patches that you have been posting
>> that is utilizing work from upstream vendor code.  How much of that is pure
>> AI driven?  How much testing has been done to see if there are actual stability
>> or performance improvements when testing actual hardware?
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> To be straightforward: my workflow involves pulling GitHub issues into
> AI prompts along with firmware analysis tooling to identify potential
> fixes. I have an MT6000 available, but I have not been doing thorough
> on-hardware testing before submitting. That is a gap I need to close.
> 
> I will hold off on submitting further patches to the mt76 driver until
> I have a proper test workflow in place and can verify changes on real
> hardware.
> 
> I appreciate you raising this directly.

Please be sure to add note about using AI to patch submissions,
and link to original bug reports you are trying to fix.

Possibly some of this is useful, but you need to do significant tests
with real hardware if you are proposing non-trivial changes.

If you are referencing publicly available upstream driver source, then
be clear about that and provide links.  'Reverse Engineering' could mean a lot of things,
some of which is grey area for patch submission.  If you talked some AI bot
into finding non public source, or if it can actually generate useful c code out of
vendor binaries, then I am not sure how legit that is to even post.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com