Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, amaindex@outlook.com,
	anna.schumaker@oracle.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	ioworker0@gmail.com, joel.granados@kernel.org,
	jstultz@google.com, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
	leonylgao@tencent.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, longman@redhat.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, mingzhe.yang@ly.com, oak@helsinkinet.fi,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, tfiga@chromium.org, will@kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hung_task: fix warnings by enforcing alignment on lock structures
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:18:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ff7bea5-185f-458e-9ae6-ddfcbdf29b7a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e0d52b4-8c69-9774-c69d-579985c0f0ee@linux-m68k.org>



On 2025/8/24 13:57, Finn Thain wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025, Lance Yang wrote:
> 
>>
>> The blocker tracking mechanism operates on pointers to higher-level
>> locks (like struct mutex), as that is what is stored in the
>> task_struct->blocker field. It does not operate on the lower-level
>> arch_spinlock_t inside it.
>>
> 
> Perhaps you are aware that the minimum alignment of the struct is at least
> the minimum alignment of the first member. I believe that the reason why

Yes, that's how it should work in theory.

> the lock is always the first member is that misaligned accesses would harm
> performance.
> 
> I really don't know why you want to argue about fixing this.

Okay, arguing further isn't productive. Looking forward to seeing
your patch ;)

Thanks,
Lance


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-24  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <f79735e1-1625-4746-98ce-a3c40123c5af@linux.dev>
2025-08-23  5:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] hung_task: fix warnings caused by unaligned lock pointers Lance Yang
2025-08-26  4:49   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-08-26  5:11     ` Lance Yang
2025-08-23  7:40 ` [PATCH 1/1] hung_task: fix warnings by enforcing alignment on lock structures Lance Yang
2025-08-23 21:53   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-24  0:47     ` Finn Thain
2025-08-24  3:03       ` Lance Yang
2025-08-24  4:18         ` Finn Thain
2025-08-24  5:02           ` Lance Yang
2025-08-24  5:57             ` Finn Thain
2025-08-24  6:18               ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-08-26  5:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-08-26  5:16     ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ff7bea5-185f-458e-9ae6-ddfcbdf29b7a@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amaindex@outlook.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@oracle.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=leonylgao@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingzhe.yang@ly.com \
    --cc=oak@helsinkinet.fi \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox