From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EDB2749E4; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757365517; cv=none; b=s3Skom1TvdHJE36QZPkrPXhDtQyExZrW1iT8G1vAQEqqLzFZTxO9/qAczD+iU1k0hic6pZiQkbyBEIE09+1T7iApoCKm59hmwhS2oTD3KJR+JiqWx7SQTJea5EtfhGhO9SrEoOkMeH0iJfvguD/6/756z3ojlT/lA5/Z5hA4BaU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757365517; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SjhPIsOXbnafUmxQCRUw77cLJlMAd0utMB+93J7XrTs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uKR1O+jVhYHtWK4RJ17zt6QwAlJNT4Eof0SgGGP+OHzbpdYf7kuG1IzKVRPSOF0oaYKHS33t6wR7Te4jFdb+ew/IjX3suGgthuErjSeY+fXeLRYHEm0V9W5ZceANl+kI2Shv+x3yM5alEKdn1tedfKTOty5O5scRSMC9hDtEqwU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=ehsYEgyz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ehsYEgyz" Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45b9853e630so45727855e9.0; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 14:05:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1757365514; x=1757970314; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date:message-id:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nD7GjWaRllncs0vWRluquCxxcL1VUrY8PY0Pyck9z94=; b=ehsYEgyzg2WoMddWBYCnBIJg809OLaWl7j15Xjs5V0qqAKpch06xbV8S6DFGegvJjW hNPiK99ea5jsYT97qdPuOIFOqsVhnHLdG6qAnzegA6RYNIffwpjxGzVIB79p/j0iJmjL NuoEGYvKsilwN6Gh93jk18iDMPdHVZoC5tp65kxH1P9SzmUkaM0IjxYho9jYwwTKO1B/ y4BgZagcxj1+F8l7RvbOQXcBqm25u8AT5ud6+ACqW4/dserfAXEq5DMMUfP3j3PEahYK vRItLHL59bBpHt+zIpZlESxKEWKMjVxQwZfIBxguGcBb7T1BAXTxqUKH27mZSSOH/bwc xs6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757365514; x=1757970314; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nD7GjWaRllncs0vWRluquCxxcL1VUrY8PY0Pyck9z94=; b=tIEktTXjB1yf9Fhw4JrcqJdyvy1S/HOQDMV1EkeRRzMVoHolbMWBau5MCohaZEUV2e gnENRBsjdrQgLgCqAe+9iXpXX6HB1lYr1Lv5wh1pD/YwbE16ukjuD4Gr7yKPY15X3QQN hwYWDKGrHVGNeUNO399rRA8nihl6aB7eJAQzu9OqLEleEHby9feIdqDKBkLaPoNwRXX0 BaCzAOuF2ylwuhKAuXptjSdfxp2akLsz0MUQ8RfLH6QVsl2v9SWi+64N7x1j4r4Jhpsv siW802P9EQ5SNsAn1X4HTSFKmBEZ1YeHJuBowYFnW714XtDGjgLSSNrTu8n43/Vq34+i wQvQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUyRa0KNL/wfZuht9sB8EZensuGJ5ut8kaARK6UutRW+rNlJsDScgG8jMcfl35mL3wmSVf3sNrJ@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCWLW0gK7x9plSRTAAfhsgIXHIS6/0vyZt3BUw2ofGW3MmAZT81/235G5hvmY6Yig8b44I+KGfcdm4dcOI45@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCXjIQ/Fjr0u31pIkio42JZ163B8BcUyI4lWXHeabsVBVMHjygl8vfpZNiBWfQ5JMdfGc6tZugjcVKkj@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwfbmQ1rQqVEb+iwkz6LxClNfyMf4r89bKy3nm5UxXvYDzwwsBW SWqwoMpeoV2h/fvUJeWRLuGKhFcySHmCsGijNSFhrEYKadXSHBIEuHbs X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuMYQWAEmUdXsa2YRu6fveZf96RoYh3ce92UAQj6fNgk+G5Hg9EG1mbQmMF9Br TtVGMbh6yvuzM++uFUJi53TGmqV7GpjKc7MPwX/QvqnaR525c0xlCty25Vlj+LhxosbyfzIP5oq tVymrdF9G4ECPUBrCBsqEeFVWKoQmbQj/uYJ6HKbyENR/KIBPGCcOJ9n2Hoh/eDU8i3wS7s4elw toN+oDfZefknZlBezIEhTeHRf00kMnJYbo+wISB2PTtD8Qa/HA2lygaTNT8qCJUwWSRS8+RBRGd vWaSeAY6eXw7+vK2458T7PLBEArPPH4jGvvUI+3I0RG+8wKnDG/oeZyBOFC0mjwxDjNekK2PiIk A7dLU6JfCJjz4cIlURyp69J2BPZ22/0kQWfkPh6lTuLTcTfQ1fSWh1F95kA4f6S+tBBOBhg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEjhWtTt2FqPYcZpCHMHRur4SWcQlNaJiusM1qV0CrfIn2kd8oGgSYbE1m3LqTOp3T97igKcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5248:b0:45b:6b57:5308 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45de078401dmr81273885e9.7.1757365513615; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 14:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ansuel-XPS. (host-95-249-236-54.retail.telecomitalia.it. [95.249.236.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-45dda202112sm160712185e9.5.2025.09.08.14.05.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Sep 2025 14:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <68bf4509.050a0220.345893.9bb4@mx.google.com> X-Google-Original-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 23:05:07 +0200 From: Christian Marangi To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andrew Lunn , Lorenzo Bianconi , Sean Wang , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Benjamin Larsson , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: airoha: fix wrong MDIO function bitmaks References: <20250908113723.31559-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <583981f9-b2ed-45fe-a327-4fd8218dc23e@lunn.ch> <68bf16e5.df0a0220.2e182c.b822@mx.google.com> <68bf2b2d.050a0220.7d5a6.b11c@mx.google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:03:31PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:14 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > > > The usage of GPIO might be confusing but this is just to instruct the > > SoC to not mess with those 2 PIN and as Benjamin reported it's also an > > Errata of 7581. The FORCE_GPIO_EN doesn't set them as GPIO function > > (that is configured by a different register) but it's really to actually > > ""enable"" those lines. > > > > Normally the SoC should autodetect this by HW but it seems AN7581 have > > problem with this and require this workaround to force enable the 2 pin. > > In reply to Andrews comment I copied the two above paragraphs into the > commit message in the applied patch. > Thanks for handling this and adding the extra info, I was about to send v2. -- Ansuel