From: Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
To: mlombard@arkamax.eu
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, bvanassche@acm.org, ddiss@suse.de,
target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, hossu.alexandru@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: target: iscsi: validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 09:53:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a0de6fc.2d57a604.3a8602.5396@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DINMKOIB4PRJ.1Y571RHF6NAQJ@arkamax.eu>
On Wed, May 20, 2026, Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@arkamax.eu> wrote:
> There is something that doesn't totally convince me about this length check.
> Couldn't chap_r contain those Base64 padding '=' characters that
> would make strlen(chap_r) too big to pass this check?
Correct. For SHA-256, a padded encoding of the 32-byte digest is 44
characters (43 data + one '='), but DIV_ROUND_UP(32 * 4, 3) = 43, so a
legitimate padded response would be incorrectly rejected.
v3 strips trailing '=' before the comparison:
size_t r_len = strlen(chap_r);
while (r_len > 0 && chap_r[r_len - 1] == '=')
r_len--;
if (r_len > DIV_ROUND_UP(chap->digest_size * 4, 3)) {
pr_err("Malformed CHAP_R: base64 payload too long\n");
goto out;
}
chap_base64_decode() already handles '=' by returning early, so
stripping them from the pre-check does not affect decoding.
v3 below.
Alexandru
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 12:18 [PATCH] scsi: target: iscsi: validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode Alexandru Hossu
2026-05-18 14:40 ` David Disseldorp
2026-05-18 23:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandru Hossu
2026-05-20 15:56 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-05-20 16:53 ` Alexandru Hossu [this message]
2026-05-20 18:02 ` Dmitry Bogdanov
2026-05-21 0:43 ` Alexandru Hossu
2026-05-18 23:51 ` [PATCH] " Alexandru Hossu
2026-05-20 16:52 ` [PATCH v3] " Alexandru Hossu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a0de6fc.2d57a604.3a8602.5396@mx.google.com \
--to=hossu.alexandru@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=ddiss@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox