From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA75347FC4; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773081010; cv=none; b=uCcqtg83b8jGVbu0LTJl/JGF1Eqep4EBHqT+Iftq0LqCOix/KftbdG5Tzib9CkVRLVrddL2FqAxIENb32w2WhjGuUx6BIz2hEbziQXWBbiyx/WqXCxGhZJlMgDVQuBTz+N7AycBBw5tVcUvXzp98kkIbFYySRY1qoOOhJ/MW89A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773081010; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+UJzHjLZwGGuI0AfcKQEJwS7MIb4u6KWqXh3m3TH5Xc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JHgLjLhOxzBj+/JSyRl9nAx5HuT+mudoU+9XuXebiwNaou7hBnZzaWzO/CcYsqpM+QrdELKPu4f1O7aJbd38J9EHZky3lGXh0EGb6Y7K8pFesMorRjdT+H631ThloDD/JNzGSqyPrbH6hDsNEpd3Dd1EwDwqWUE97/zQJeGG4O0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=uaLDyC/Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uaLDyC/Q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC7DEC4CEF7; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:30:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773081010; bh=+UJzHjLZwGGuI0AfcKQEJwS7MIb4u6KWqXh3m3TH5Xc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=uaLDyC/Qu4fy3deedF/z2hM1aI3c2Gcg8EgLOV7AOL//UeUIBB9JuM9N+i6shGkzg 4SWrQguTccGJFTKQXdq2SiYxestVtCoivtoCeIh66kCBt5xs74Isc/kbw4nZjaud3v 5Qd37dK40jfFSERQ2QmT6WLRgHN4UzR04W1ipAZ48RQECrpVQiLX5y5cPY++5GD7QH 2gUXiNs5o9pGxcolfkti6P5q26SrkTfBUIP4svv6CfgBtL4+KrhIaZpsNCwLCOTh1v bl33Ax5d315dur+HvExLqTW6qN02aqieyLFwmQzaoX7x6E0agtrx7KUIrHuZrUfyJT uu0GelEVTJKCA== Message-ID: <6d263c6c-9a2c-46ef-bbd5-fd812f57b902@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 19:30:06 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: check RM_ADDR not sent over same" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree Content-Language: fr To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kuba@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, MPTCP Linux References: <2026030948-nickname-laxative-fd1d@gregkh> From: Matthieu Baerts Autocrypt: addr=matttbe@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFXj+ekBEADxVr99p2guPcqHFeI/JcFxls6KibzyZD5TQTyfuYlzEp7C7A9swoK5iCvf YBNdx5Xl74NLSgx6y/1NiMQGuKeu+2BmtnkiGxBNanfXcnl4L4Lzz+iXBvvbtCbynnnqDDqU c7SPFMpMesgpcu1xFt0F6bcxE+0ojRtSCZ5HDElKlHJNYtD1uwY4UYVGWUGCF/+cY1YLmtfb WdNb/SFo+Mp0HItfBC12qtDIXYvbfNUGVnA5jXeWMEyYhSNktLnpDL2gBUCsdbkov5VjiOX7 CRTkX0UgNWRjyFZwThaZADEvAOo12M5uSBk7h07yJ97gqvBtcx45IsJwfUJE4hy8qZqsA62A nTRflBvp647IXAiCcwWsEgE5AXKwA3aL6dcpVR17JXJ6nwHHnslVi8WesiqzUI9sbO/hXeXw TDSB+YhErbNOxvHqCzZEnGAAFf6ges26fRVyuU119AzO40sjdLV0l6LE7GshddyazWZf0iac nEhX9NKxGnuhMu5SXmo2poIQttJuYAvTVUNwQVEx/0yY5xmiuyqvXa+XT7NKJkOZSiAPlNt6 VffjgOP62S7M9wDShUghN3F7CPOrrRsOHWO/l6I/qJdUMW+MHSFYPfYiFXoLUZyPvNVCYSgs 3oQaFhHapq1f345XBtfG3fOYp1K2wTXd4ThFraTLl8PHxCn4ywARAQABzSRNYXR0aGlldSBC YWVydHMgPG1hdHR0YmVAa2VybmVsLm9yZz7CwZEEEwEIADsCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYC AwECHgECF4AWIQToy4X3aHcFem4n93r2t4JPQmmgcwUCZUDpDAIZAQAKCRD2t4JPQmmgcz33 EACjROM3nj9FGclR5AlyPUbAq/txEX7E0EFQCDtdLPrjBcLAoaYJIQUV8IDCcPjZMJy2ADp7 /zSwYba2rE2C9vRgjXZJNt21mySvKnnkPbNQGkNRl3TZAinO1Ddq3fp2c/GmYaW1NWFSfOmw MvB5CJaN0UK5l0/drnaA6Hxsu62V5UnpvxWgexqDuo0wfpEeP1PEqMNzyiVPvJ8bJxgM8qoC cpXLp1Rq/jq7pbUycY8GeYw2j+FVZJHlhL0w0Zm9CFHThHxRAm1tsIPc+oTorx7haXP+nN0J iqBXVAxLK2KxrHtMygim50xk2QpUotWYfZpRRv8dMygEPIB3f1Vi5JMwP4M47NZNdpqVkHrm jvcNuLfDgf/vqUvuXs2eA2/BkIHcOuAAbsvreX1WX1rTHmx5ud3OhsWQQRVL2rt+0p1DpROI 3Ob8F78W5rKr4HYvjX2Inpy3WahAm7FzUY184OyfPO/2zadKCqg8n01mWA9PXxs84bFEV2mP VzC5j6K8U3RNA6cb9bpE5bzXut6T2gxj6j+7TsgMQFhbyH/tZgpDjWvAiPZHb3sV29t8XaOF BwzqiI2AEkiWMySiHwCCMsIH9WUH7r7vpwROko89Tk+InpEbiphPjd7qAkyJ+tNIEWd1+MlX ZPtOaFLVHhLQ3PLFLkrU3+Yi3tXqpvLE3gO3LM7BTQRV4/npARAA5+u/Sx1n9anIqcgHpA7l 5SUCP1e/qF7n5DK8LiM10gYglgY0XHOBi0S7vHppH8hrtpizx+7t5DBdPJgVtR6SilyK0/mp 9nWHDhc9rwU3KmHYgFFsnX58eEmZxz2qsIY8juFor5r7kpcM5dRR9aB+HjlOOJJgyDxcJTwM 1ey4L/79P72wuXRhMibN14SX6TZzf+/XIOrM6TsULVJEIv1+NdczQbs6pBTpEK/G2apME7vf mjTsZU26Ezn+LDMX16lHTmIJi7Hlh7eifCGGM+g/AlDV6aWKFS+sBbwy+YoS0Zc3Yz8zrdbi Kzn3kbKd+99//mysSVsHaekQYyVvO0KD2KPKBs1S/ImrBb6XecqxGy/y/3HWHdngGEY2v2IP Qox7mAPznyKyXEfG+0rrVseZSEssKmY01IsgwwbmN9ZcqUKYNhjv67WMX7tNwiVbSrGLZoqf Xlgw4aAdnIMQyTW8nE6hH/Iwqay4S2str4HZtWwyWLitk7N+e+vxuK5qto4AxtB7VdimvKUs x6kQO5F3YWcC3vCXCgPwyV8133+fIR2L81R1L1q3swaEuh95vWj6iskxeNWSTyFAVKYYVskG V+OTtB71P1XCnb6AJCW9cKpC25+zxQqD2Zy0dK3u2RuKErajKBa/YWzuSaKAOkneFxG3LJIv Hl7iqPF+JDCjB5sAEQEAAcLBXwQYAQIACQUCVeP56QIbDAAKCRD2t4JPQmmgc5VnD/9YgbCr HR1FbMbm7td54UrYvZV/i7m3dIQNXK2e+Cbv5PXf19ce3XluaE+wA8D+vnIW5mbAAiojt3Mb 6p0WJS3QzbObzHNgAp3zy/L4lXwc6WW5vnpWAzqXFHP8D9PTpqvBALbXqL06smP47JqbyQxj Xf7D2rrPeIqbYmVY9da1KzMOVf3gReazYa89zZSdVkMojfWsbq05zwYU+SCWS3NiyF6QghbW voxbFwX1i/0xRwJiX9NNbRj1huVKQuS4W7rbWA87TrVQPXUAdkyd7FRYICNW+0gddysIwPoa KrLfx3Ba6Rpx0JznbrVOtXlihjl4KV8mtOPjYDY9u+8x412xXnlGl6AC4HLu2F3ECkamY4G6 UxejX+E6vW6Xe4n7H+rEX5UFgPRdYkS1TA/X3nMen9bouxNsvIJv7C6adZmMHqu/2azX7S7I vrxxySzOw9GxjoVTuzWMKWpDGP8n71IFeOot8JuPZtJ8omz+DZel+WCNZMVdVNLPOd5frqOv mpz0VhFAlNTjU1Vy0CnuxX3AM51J8dpdNyG0S8rADh6C8AKCDOfUstpq28/6oTaQv7QZdge0 JY6dglzGKnCi/zsmp2+1w559frz4+IC7j/igvJGX4KDDKUs0mlld8J2u2sBXv7CGxdzQoHaz lzVbFe7fduHbABmYz9cefQpO7wDE/Q== Organization: NGI0 Core In-Reply-To: <2026030948-nickname-laxative-fd1d@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Greg, Sasha, On 09/03/2026 11:29, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . Thank you for the notification! And thank you Sasha for having resolved some conflicts already! (...) > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > From 560edd99b5f58b2d4bbe3c8e51e1eed68d887b0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 11:56:04 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: check RM_ADDR not sent over same > subflow > > This validates the previous commit: RM_ADDR were sent over the first > found active subflow which could be the same as the one being removed. > It is more likely to loose this notification. > > For this check, RM_ADDR are explicitly dropped when trying to send them > over the initial subflow, when removing the endpoint attached to it. If > it is dropped, the test will complain because some RM_ADDR have not been > received. > > Note that only the RM_ADDR are dropped, to allow the linked subflow to > be quickly and cleanly closed. To only drop those RM_ADDR, a cBPF byte > code is used. If the IPTables commands fail, that's OK, the tests will > continue to pass, but not validate this part. This can be ignored: > another subtest fully depends on such command, and will be marked as > skipped. > > The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous > commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, > but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit > ID. No need to backport this patch: it is just a validation in the selftest for the parent commit, and the subtest that it modifies is not in v5.15. CI can use newer selftests version to validate the fix on v5.15. Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.