From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A51B3ED3C3 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787230248; cv=none; b=mhN246RWvEz+qeoIiUzMeqdEiodSVIQFoSx5xcrENTLfnNT58wRlnwEg8Ys5GgGt/SHCO30TSPNz6oFyo3Rrj3l57RgfUa4I/6S/+TCbCkmdrepmSJcgNKx0a5AtT/GsVOCoCZY0W+PwoyrK7o6oxuYTtMJ69aDaogAL1/q2wa4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787230248; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vIuzLiY7OxCmfcl5opyGG5r8wQFHqJEDnbfBxie1K74=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=FZzyEOLjADALYOJ4FaPMWZwLqiJ9rteYTOa8t0G4CK6uOAqRZTkvQv/KscZr67zaXixjQw/W5oTL/ikti0nwiPyWU/8/98yw6vB22upqKlEzkMW32HgahlIwjc2gx5cXso9RBO7dkrmMcVG4PrycnRUt0DTxmx4MPxQ63YQ0/aY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=k5Q2lW96; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="k5Q2lW96" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1787230247; x=1818766247; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vIuzLiY7OxCmfcl5opyGG5r8wQFHqJEDnbfBxie1K74=; b=k5Q2lW96eobz84bqDlS9nKGxQHXKCHLm7MF6X4/1Q0uO7VJVKe+Uz29U S/kAPsH+ikdeP9kbfaYC6ddd9msnGdcETGZgs49edGKgbgLOYwDdBHkKU 10SSx9vaPfsVgVt673f4mDNpWONnXzXMj49U88T1nU8VasVvG6FMH21Xz LVUP7S4upvry40iaeUxiilm4h1/QChcfhT0/cP0ThE8EeKr0wFZBy/YwB hPCN8BDV5YlpDtdx7R3IYcRjVY7nTcacDYF70fFHgsCNQuXSYPws9sHHl KAi9pEYV4E8IoUtsGrd81G/cFJ8gbcQbGXTlniUUVuMZVd5hJYHyB7ifh A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: s52HmidCS9WXj69dFig57w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oxOjjAAeTyuGOIOcqJtNvw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11880"; a="91441897" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,233,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="91441897" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2026 05:50:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ricorxZrRCuTHae6yrJGRA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5iNnPi6uTPqSr4fUcTw9wQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,233,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="261765027" Received: from szadworn-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.245.246.124]) ([10.245.246.124]) by fmviesa006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2026 05:50:43 -0700 Message-ID: <6e773e06-ab3a-40fd-aeb2-f411ed51e412@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 15:50:42 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Refresh copier IPC payload before" failed to apply to 7.1-stable tree To: Greg KH Cc: broonie@kernel.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, liam.r.girdwood@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <2026082016-frisk-riches-3e59@gregkh> <1142f719-4f26-4a2f-be99-af4822cd78b1@linux.intel.com> <2026082057-sulfite-daunting-34da@gregkh> From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A9ter_Ujfalusi?= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <2026082057-sulfite-daunting-34da@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 20/08/2026 14:49, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 02:45:30PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > I see major conflicts here: > > Applying patch asoc-sof-ipc4-topology-refresh-copier-ipc-payload-before-widget-setup.patch > patching file sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 3167 (offset -37 lines). > Hunk #2 FAILED at 3221. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 3229. > 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c > Patch asoc-sof-ipc4-topology-refresh-copier-ipc-payload-before-widget-setup.patch does not apply (enforce with -f) I see no such conflicts on top of 7.1.9 tag, checking the original and picked patch with -U20 I don't see any difference in the surrounding either. I have sent my version of cherry-pick as per instructions in original mail. -- Péter