From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <weidu.du@huawei.com>,
Fang Wei <fangwei1@huawei.com>, Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: erofs: keep corrupted fs from crashing kernel in erofs_namei()
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:04:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71f44997-a32a-1384-e350-dc822a2cea13@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190215075757.GG2326@kadam>
Hi Dan,
On 2019/2/15 15:57, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 03:02:25PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/2/1 20:16, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> + * on-disk error, let's only BUG_ON in the debugging mode.
>>> + * otherwise, it will return 1 to just skip the invalid name
>>> + * and go on (in consideration of the lookup performance).
>>> + */
>>> + DBG_BUGON(qd->name > qd->end);
>>
>> qd->name == qd->end is not allowed as well?
>>
>> So will it be better to return directly here?
>>
>> if (unlikely(qd->name >= qd->end)) {
>> DBG_BUGON(1);
>> return 1;
>> }
>
> Please don't add likely/unlikely() annotations unless you have
> benchmarked it and it makes a difference.
I tend not to add this branch above since the current logic can handle
qd->name >= qd->end (it only happens in corrupted images) and
it will return 1;
Let's just leave DBG_BUGON(qd->name > qd->end); here for debugging use
(to detect corrupted image in some degree earlier).
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-01 12:16 [PATCH v2] staging: erofs: keep corrupted fs from crashing kernel in erofs_namei() Gao Xiang
2019-02-12 5:05 ` Gao Xiang
2019-02-15 7:02 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-15 7:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-02-15 9:04 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2019-02-15 9:32 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-15 9:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-02-15 10:33 ` Gao Xiang
2019-02-18 2:41 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-18 6:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-02-15 8:58 ` Gao Xiang
2019-02-18 1:39 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-18 2:17 ` Gao Xiang
2019-02-18 2:50 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71f44997-a32a-1384-e350-dc822a2cea13@huawei.com \
--to=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=weidu.du@huawei.com \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox