From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8236F2DE1F9 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 13:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750168265; cv=none; b=MxA29h1jh5KmCxM3XHBT0pAJoB3nBiKcu99qWz7G4qeT9pE88AFH7c5ZLaW5hh60YXDQ3+O/TVpDxfNuYkQYa4B6oPjiMVy31CTTj5OvJfqEgHwmG8TCY+P7mHxiD9nD5GZNqc/mD1aAdu4X0cHwkdG2yHR00mFqWkUcV18Kxpk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750168265; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oblIbLPaqrXVUT3EQc2wh4ZJeO7Rv/Ddz0Kv3NAxSpI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=M56b6RyjDrCB9waAebHAlo1N5IcWFqv7hzYyUWjn6xPZ/ZDykrNU2KwEU/1PG08A4VvbdEpclhNkF9RvhbgyBortVY5AYHHj38x1SenXm1TnckMcJEjXE/N8DzD2uVz2N09agjNtaTMg5bW6MEf4Yftg9e7vBZ/NR3Y0+h5ZfHM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=d5z3hu0T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="d5z3hu0T" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1750168263; x=1781704263; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=oblIbLPaqrXVUT3EQc2wh4ZJeO7Rv/Ddz0Kv3NAxSpI=; b=d5z3hu0T4+AzzSxgIjvjynu5j3ULkOWkJVddFOLSttJclVwGVEBqmOnj ZzB1RwS3mD9/2UyDdDRJEn2WASN+VOZEVPNEW4aYeObShfmmowkdKmz/r CLlTmfzaNXSoK/i39bYThWAeqnsRekpgX7aKdhxI+jAj8AGhcOO3Y/IwH 818Mudnl9cwCoi8jatuyMQZaHM4W08uUALsjSRcgqLPp5+gs2pkWqqlDz 3MT1ir434cWzDnjn3xsU0YT5GxMfgvCAcKofet+2XUo9ELXqnqkgXcG9J QDPBtHeV6dq4Ta6+jlznoAtHvrlRD6aTEPNl2s9jMcD/c9/Q7rpg+FB2x A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Pkb7l4HhRdSPaCMosPbDzQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Nfq2IH9mQDGAIjv3+jscOA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11467"; a="39952664" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,243,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="39952664" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jun 2025 06:51:03 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vlPePXCbSMeJKDhDTdmHVQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UMuJwXBfQzu4kKORQebYCQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,243,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="149267460" Received: from cpetruta-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.111]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jun 2025 06:51:00 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Vas Novikov , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, Ankit Nautiyal , Suraj Kandpal , Khaled Almahallawy , Rodrigo Vivi , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christian Heusel Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] intel iGPU with HDMI PLL stopped working at 1080p@120Hz 1efd5384 In-Reply-To: <33046593-17e3-4bdc-9d4a-94dc94ef5e81@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <8d7c7958-9558-4c8a-a81a-e9310f2d8852@gmail.com> <33046593-17e3-4bdc-9d4a-94dc94ef5e81@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 16:50:57 +0300 Message-ID: <72c9ef36e81ddce8a9e91c5f3652489f5fa2d78d@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, 17 Jun 2025, Vas Novikov wrote: > Hi Jani and everyone, > > On 17/06/2025 12.33, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Does [1] help? > > The patch works. (Applied on top of 6.16.0-rc2-1.1-mainline, built by > Christian @gromit who helped again.) > > The patch (or the new kernel) also have a side effect of xrandr allowing > a completely new refresh rate, ~144Hz. This new refresh also seems to > work (I cannot easily disambiguate 144 versus 120, but I can tell it's > not 60Hz). So as far as my hardware is concerned, this patch leaves the > whole system working in all scenarios that I've tested. Thanks a lot for testing! Ankit will send a v2 of it, and I think we'll have it in mainline and backported to stable in a few weeks. There's no need to file that bug report, this will suffice. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel