From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
lauro.venancio@openbossa.org, sameo@linux.intel.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: Fix error handling in nfc_genl_dump_targets
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:30:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7557d32c-c5e1-4e73-aefe-23ebf4bea708@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c0b6a08-cbaa-4e7e-8689-1fa716dd1525@kernel.org>
On 24/11/2025 09:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/11/2025 03:27, Ma Ke wrote:
>> nfc_genl_dump_targets() increments the device reference count via
>
> Only in some cases, but you drop it unconditionally.
>
>> nfc_get_device() but fails to decrement it properly. nfc_get_device()
>> calls class_find_device() which internally calls get_device() to
>> increment the reference count. No corresponding put_device() is made
>> to decrement the reference count.
>>
>> Add proper reference count decrementing using nfc_put_device() when
>> the dump operation completes or encounters an error, ensuring balanced
>> reference counting.
>>
>> Found by code review.
>
> Drop, there is no point nor need to say that humans did the work. This
> actually rather suggests you used LLM and disguise your finding as "code
> review".
>
> No, LLM is not code review.
Looks like LLM.
>
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Fixes: 4d12b8b129f1 ("NFC: add nfc generic netlink interface")
>> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
>> ---
>> net/nfc/netlink.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/nfc/netlink.c b/net/nfc/netlink.c
>> index a18e2c503da6..9ae138ee91dd 100644
>> --- a/net/nfc/netlink.c
>> +++ b/net/nfc/netlink.c
>> @@ -159,6 +159,11 @@ static int nfc_genl_dump_targets(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>
>> cb->args[0] = i;
>>
>> + if (rc < 0 || i >= dev->n_targets) {
>> + nfc_put_device(dev);
>> + cb->args[1] = 0;
>
> Did you test it?
I am pretty sure this is double put and thus bug. There is put in done().
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-21 2:27 [PATCH] NFC: Fix error handling in nfc_genl_dump_targets Ma Ke
2025-11-24 8:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-24 8:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-14 13:17 Ma Ke
2025-12-14 13:54 ` David Laight
2025-12-15 8:39 ` Johannes Berg
2025-12-15 11:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7557d32c-c5e1-4e73-aefe-23ebf4bea708@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lauro.venancio@openbossa.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=make24@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox