Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@igalia.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] drm/sched: Always wake up correct scheduler in drm_sched_entity_push_job
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:42:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7615a599-e85c-49d8-bf9a-1b36f0ed1f00@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240909171937.51550-3-tursulin@igalia.com>

Am 09.09.24 um 19:19 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
>
> Since drm_sched_entity_modify_sched() can modify the entities run queue,
> lets make sure to only dereference the pointer once so both adding and
> waking up are guaranteed to be consistent.
>
> Alternative of moving the spin_unlock to after the wake up would for now
> be more problematic since the same lock is taken inside
> drm_sched_rq_update_fifo().
>
> v2:
>   * Improve commit message. (Philipp)
>   * Cache the scheduler pointer directly. (Christian)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
> Fixes: b37aced31eb0 ("drm/scheduler: implement a function to modify sched list")
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 10 ++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> index ae8be30472cd..76e422548d40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
>   
>   	/* first job wakes up scheduler */
>   	if (first) {
> +		struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
> +		struct drm_sched_rq *rq;
> +
>   		/* Add the entity to the run queue */
>   		spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
>   		if (entity->stopped) {
> @@ -608,13 +611,16 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
>   			return;
>   		}
>   
> -		drm_sched_rq_add_entity(entity->rq, entity);
> +		rq = entity->rq;
> +		sched = rq->sched;

The rq variable is now not needed any more except for getting the 
scheduler, isn't it? If yes I would ditch that as well.

Either way Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> to 
this patch.

Regards,
Christian.

> +
> +		drm_sched_rq_add_entity(rq, entity);
>   		spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
>   
>   		if (drm_sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO)
>   			drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, submit_ts);
>   
> -		drm_sched_wakeup(entity->rq->sched, entity);
> +		drm_sched_wakeup(sched, entity);
>   	}
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_entity_push_job);


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-10  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240909171937.51550-1-tursulin@igalia.com>
2024-09-09 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/sched: Add locking to drm_sched_entity_modify_sched Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-09-10  7:43   ` Christian König
2024-09-09 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/sched: Always wake up correct scheduler in drm_sched_entity_push_job Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-09-10  7:42   ` Christian König [this message]
2024-09-09 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/sched: Always increment correct scheduler score Tvrtko Ursulin
     [not found] <20240913160559.49054-1-tursulin@igalia.com>
2024-09-13 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/sched: Always wake up correct scheduler in drm_sched_entity_push_job Tvrtko Ursulin
     [not found] <20240924101914.2713-1-tursulin@igalia.com>
2024-09-24 10:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-09-24 13:55   ` Christian König
2024-09-24 14:12     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-09-24 14:20       ` Christian König
2024-09-24 14:54         ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7615a599-e85c-49d8-bf9a-1b36f0ed1f00@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tursulin@igalia.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox