From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.37]:37658 "EHLO mx5-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751748AbcDRJWp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:22:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:20:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Vladis Dronov To: Yuki Machida Cc: sasha levin , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, oneukum@suse.com, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, ralf@spenneberg.net Message-ID: <769622525.6010599.1460971254286.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <57149B8C.8010900@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <570B33E6.40705@jp.fujitsu.com> <573811194.2583282.1460376200290.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <5710A6D5.8000302@jp.fujitsu.com> <1369454336.4654676.1460714156331.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <57149B8C.8010900@jp.fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, Yuki, all, > Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ? As mentioned in a message from Hans down this thread, it "fell through the cracks", unfortunately. (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg99495.html) Best regards, Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | Product Security Engineer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yuki Machida" To: "Vladis Dronov" Cc: "sasha levin" , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, oneukum@suse.com, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, ralf@spenneberg.net Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 10:32:12 AM Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1 Hi Vladis, On 2016年04月15日 18:55, Vladis Dronov wrote: > Hello, Yuki, all, > > My commit fa52bd506f resolves CVE-2015-7833, as mentioned in > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg96936.html I understand that commit fa52bd506f resolved security issue of CVE-2015-7833 and commit 588afcc1 is not needed for fixing of CVE-2015-7833. > Please, note a message from Hans down this thread, who agrees > with my point. I understand the opinion of Vladis and Hans. Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ? Regards, Yuki Machida