From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Kevin Hilman To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.12 000/106] 4.12.6-stable review References: <20170809164515.714288642@linuxfoundation.org> <598b71c1.82451c0a.e2f6d.b0fa@mx.google.com> <20170809214742.GA27534@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:41:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170809214742.GA27534@kroah.com> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Wed, 9 Aug 2017 14:47:42 -0700") Message-ID: <7hfuczbfbw.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 01:34:09PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> stable-rc/linux-4.12.y boot: 211 boots: 17 failed, 194 passed (v4.12.5-106-g38a3c1c9f248) >> >> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.12.y/kernel/v4.12.5-106-g38a3c1c9f248/ >> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.12.y/kernel/v4.12.5-106-g38a3c1c9f248/ > > 17 feels like a lot of failures, are these all just broken platforms? I didn't look too closely because looks like there was another patch added, and this time through, only 8 failures[1] (out of 524 boots). I'll try to have a closer look at those today, but a first glance looks like there aren't any real regressions. Kevin [1] https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.12.y/kernel/v4.12.5-107-ge6f7239c338e/