From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:36075 "EHLO mail-pf0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965018AbcJQQn6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:43:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f179.google.com with SMTP id e6so80939044pfk.3 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:43:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Hilman To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/37] 4.8.2-stable review References: <20161014122549.411962735@linuxfoundation.org> <58013af0.6106c30a.958bb.adf8@mx.google.com> <20161015113834.GA12279@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:43:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20161015113834.GA12279@kroah.com> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2016 13:38:34 +0200") Message-ID: <7hfunvc4dw.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:07:12PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> stable-rc boot: 8 boots: 0 failed, 4 passed with 4 offline (v4.8.1-38-g9ccca26a1585) > > That's not many boots, what went wrong here? What happened to the 100+ > that 4.7 was getting? Hmm, looks like there were no ARM builds, which is what most of the boot platforms are. Not sure yet what went wrong there. But v4.8.2 itself is looking fine, with three known failures that are under investigation: https://kernelci.org/job/stable-rc/branch/local:linux-4.8.y/ Kevin