From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:33886 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754143AbbGJSvp (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:51:45 -0400 Received: by pdbep18 with SMTP id ep18so188734015pdb.1 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:51:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Hilman To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/14] 3.10.84-stable review References: <20150708073102.284623533@linuxfoundation.org> <7hy4ipb3n3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <20150710173447.GG10580@kroah.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:51:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150710173447.GG10580@kroah.com> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:34:47 -0700") Message-ID: <7hfv4vals1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:13:36AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: >> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.84 release. >> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> > let me know. >> >> Boot test results from kernelci.org below. Note that the boot failures >> found are not new failures in this version, so should not block release. > > Anything we should be backporting to resolve those failures? Or does > this kernel version just not really matter for those platforms? We're looking into the failures now, and will submit any backports needed. However, I think these remaining failures are just things that never worked in v3.10, and we're finding as we add platforms to kernelci.org. In those cases, we'll just blacklist those from testing on v3.10. Kevin