public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: James Gowans <jgowans@amazon.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>, <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	<yuzenghui@huawei.com>, <sironi@amazon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Make the doorbell request robust w.r.t preemption
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:42:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <864j98i3r3.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701111933.41973-1-jgowans@amazon.com>

On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 12:19:33 +0100,
James Gowans <jgowans@amazon.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> 
> Xiang reports that VMs occasionally fail to boot on GICv4.1 systems when
> running a preemptible kernel, as it is possible that a vCPU is blocked
> without requesting a doorbell interrupt.
> 
> The issue is that any preemption that occurs between vgic_v4_put() and
> schedule() on the block path will mark the vPE as nonresident and *not*
> request a doorbell irq. This occurs because when the vcpu thread is
> resumed on its way to block, vcpu_load() will make the vPE resident
> again. Once the vcpu actually blocks, we don't request a doorbell
> anymore, and the vcpu won't be woken up on interrupt delivery.
> 
> Fix it by tracking that we're entering WFI, and key the doorbell
> request on that flag. This allows us not to make the vPE resident
> when going through a preempt/schedule cycle, meaning we don't lose
> any state.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 8e01d9a396e6 ("KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Move the GICv4 residency flow to be driven by vcpu_load/put")
> Reported-by: Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
> Suggested-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
> Co-developed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230713070657.3873244-1-maz@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> 
> (cherry picked from commit b321c31c9b7b309dcde5e8854b741c8e6a9a05f0)
> 
> [modified to wrangle the vCPU flags directly instead of going through
> the flag helper macros as they have not yet been introduced. Also doing
> the flag wranging in the kvm_arch_vcpu_{un}blocking() hooks as the
> introduction of kvm_vcpu_wfi has not yet happened. See:
> 6109c5a6ab7f ("KVM: arm64: Move vGIC v4 handling for WFI out arch callback hook")]
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Gowans <jgowans@amazon.com>

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-02  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-23 20:41 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Make the doorbell request robust w.r.t" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2024-07-01 11:19 ` [PATCH 5.15.y] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Make the doorbell request robust w.r.t preemption James Gowans
2024-07-02  8:42   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-07-02 10:41   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=864j98i3r3.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sironi@amazon.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox