stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/execlists: Enable timeslice on partial virtual engine dequeue
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:06:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dzx4ly7.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200306113012.3184606-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> If we stop filling the ELSP due to an incompatible virtual engine
> request, check if we should enable the timeslice on behalf of the queue.
>
> This fixes the case where we are inspecting the last->next element when
> we know that the last element is the last request in the execution queue,
> and so decided we did not need to enable timeslicing despite the intent
> to do so!
>
> Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 13941d1c0a4a..a1d268880cfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1757,11 +1757,9 @@ need_timeslice(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, const struct i915_request *rq)
>  	if (!intel_engine_has_timeslices(engine))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if (list_is_last(&rq->sched.link, &engine->active.requests))
> -		return false;
> -
> -	hint = max(rq_prio(list_next_entry(rq, sched.link)),
> -		   engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint);
> +	hint = engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint;
> +	if (!list_is_last(&rq->sched.link, &engine->active.requests))
> +		hint = max(hint, rq_prio(list_next_entry(rq, sched.link)));
>  
>  	return hint >= effective_prio(rq);
>  }
> @@ -1803,6 +1801,18 @@ static void set_timeslice(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  	set_timer_ms(&engine->execlists.timer, active_timeslice(engine));
>  }
>  
> +static void start_timeslice(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> +	struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = &engine->execlists;
> +
> +	execlists->switch_priority_hint = execlists->queue_priority_hint;
> +
> +	if (timer_pending(&execlists->timer))
> +		return;
> +
> +	set_timer_ms(&execlists->timer, timeslice(engine));
> +}
> +
>  static void record_preemption(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
>  {
>  	(void)I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(execlists->preempt_hang.count++);
> @@ -1966,11 +1976,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  				 * Even if ELSP[1] is occupied and not worthy
>  				 * of timeslices, our queue might be.
>  				 */
> -				if (!execlists->timer.expires &&
> -				    need_timeslice(engine, last))
> -					set_timer_ms(&execlists->timer,
> -						     timeslice(engine));
> -
> +				start_timeslice(engine);
>  				return;
>  			}
>  		}
> @@ -2005,7 +2011,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  
>  			if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) {
>  				spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> -				return; /* leave this for another */
> +				start_timeslice(engine);
> +				return; /* leave this for another sibling */
>  			}
>  
>  			ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
> -- 
> 2.25.1

      reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-06 11:30 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/execlists: Enable timeslice on partial virtual engine dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-03-06 14:06 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dzx4ly7.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).