From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B704CE7A94 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231535AbjIYNHh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:07:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34302 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231487AbjIYNHh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:07:37 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A11D9F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 06:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:53354) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1qklJB-000p2h-Lt; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 07:07:29 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-168-167.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.168.167]:47200 helo=email.froward.int.ebiederm.org.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1qklJA-008TT1-Ig; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 07:07:29 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: kernel test robot Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev References: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 08:07:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: (kernel test robot's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2023 21:00:21 +0800") Message-ID: <87a5tammeu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1qklJA-008TT1-Ig;;;mid=<87a5tammeu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.168.167;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=pass X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/5pqfAVKwh7eCQGzbtGPJyQrycv0htxxw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.168.167 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Support segments with 0 filesz and misaligned starts X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org kernel test robot writes: > Hi, > > Thanks for your patch. > > FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied. > > The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html/#option-1 > > Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree. > Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Support segments with 0 filesz and misaligned starts > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/87jzsemmsd.fsf_-_%40email.froward.int.ebiederm.org My apologies kernel test robot I had realized stable was cc'd on this conversation. This patch as is, is most definitely not stable fodder. Maybe after being tested. It is definitely not a regression fix, and I am not certain even after being tested it could be considered a fix rather than just a new feature. AKA "Support very weird compiler generated exectuables". Eric