From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:63677 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752729AbcJKKyM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:54:12 -0400 From: Jani Nikula To: Greg KH Cc: Paulo Zanoni , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Dhinakaran Pandiyan Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gen9: unconditionally apply the memory bandwidth WA In-Reply-To: <20161011103107.GA9793@kroah.com> References: <1476131459-23763-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> <87wphfqqyx.fsf@intel.com> <20161011103107.GA9793@kroah.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:54:09 +0300 Message-ID: <87a8ebqhpq.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:34:14AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> The patch is a bit on the large side for stable. 100 lines with context >> is the rule. > > Huh? It's only 49 line of changes: > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > That's fine for stable, we take i915 stable patches much bigger than > that all the time :) Oh, I thought the rule was "100 lines, with context", but I certainly won't argue! Never mind! ;) BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center