Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <cl@linux.com>,
	<iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>,
	<n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	<wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>, <mm-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + mm-migrate-fix-ref-count-handling-when-hugepage_migration_supported-v2.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 15:52:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bmqfd61m.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170526104239.d2dwmm3vdcjx2g5n@techsingularity.net> (Mel Gorman's message of "Fri, 26 May 2017 11:42:39 +0100")

Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> writes:

> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 03:46:23PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
>> Subject: mm/migrate: fix refcount handling when !hugepage_migration_supported()
>> 
>> On failing to migrate a page, soft_offline_huge_page() performs the
>> necessary update to the hugepage ref-count.  When
>> !hugepage_migration_supported() , unmap_and_move_hugepage() also
>> decrements the page ref-count for the hugepage.  The combined behaviour
>> leaves the ref-count in an inconsistent state.
>> 
>> This leads to soft lockups when running the overcommitted hugepage test
>> from mce-tests suite.
>> 
>> Soft offlining pfn 0x83ed600 at process virtual address 0x400000000000
>> soft offline: 0x83ed600: migration failed 1, type
>> 1fffc00000008008 (uptodate|head)
>> INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
>>  Tasks blocked on level-0 rcu_node (CPUs 0-7): P2715
>>   (detected by 7, t=5254 jiffies, g=963, c=962, q=321)
>>   thugetlb_overco R  running task        0  2715   2685 0x00000008
>>   Call trace:
>>   [<ffff000008089f90>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x268
>>   [<ffff00000808a2d4>] show_stack+0x24/0x30
>>   [<ffff000008100d34>] sched_show_task+0x134/0x180
>>   [<ffff0000081c90fc>] rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp+0x54/0x7c
>>   [<ffff00000813cfd4>] rcu_check_callbacks+0xa74/0xb08
>>   [<ffff000008143a3c>] update_process_times+0x34/0x60
>>   [<ffff0000081550e8>] tick_sched_handle.isra.7+0x38/0x70
>>   [<ffff00000815516c>] tick_sched_timer+0x4c/0x98
>>   [<ffff0000081442e0>] __hrtimer_run_queues+0xc0/0x300
>>   [<ffff000008144fa4>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xac/0x228
>>   [<ffff0000089a56d4>] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x3c/0x50
>>   [<ffff00000812f1bc>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x8c/0x290
>>   [<ffff0000081297fc>] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
>>   [<ffff000008129f00>] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
>>   [<ffff0000080816b4>] gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xb0
>> 
>> Address this by changing the putback_active_hugepage() in
>> soft_offline_huge_page() to putback_movable_pages().
>> 
>
> I've never looked too closely at how hardware poisoning and hugetlb pages
> migration is handled so I could easily have missed something but this
> changelog and patch confuses me.
>
> Surely if the inconsistency is between hugepage_migration_supported and
> !hugepage_migration_supported then the check in soft_offline_huge_page()
> should also be related to hugepage_migration_supported either in
> soft_offline_huge_page() or in putback_movable_pages()?

The first version of the patch did indeed make a change that was around
!hugepage_migration_supported() [0] which was effectively a revert of
32665f2bbfed ("mm/migrate: correct failure handling if
!hugepage_migration_support()").

But Horiguchi-san suggested that dropping the putback_active_hugepage()
from unmap_and_move_hugepage() will bring back the issue that
32665f2bbfed addressed it was safer to take the current approach. It
also matches the pattern followed for !hugepage.

I did update the changelog but perhaps not enough - would updating the
changelog to reflect this help make it clearer?

Thanks,
Punit

[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2516334.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-26 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-25 22:46 + mm-migrate-fix-ref-count-handling-when-hugepage_migration_supported-v2.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2017-05-26  5:41 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2017-05-26  9:22 ` Punit Agrawal
2017-05-26 10:42 ` Mel Gorman
2017-05-26 14:52   ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2017-05-26 15:33     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bmqfd61m.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=manoj.iyer@canonical.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox