From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C09031814C for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757502571; cv=none; b=jUcWAukn+G8OtAXkJP2qpfsERL1z49YWWfjNkBUFIPSL5h2l5KnNNCsKtdLW5Q/m9d1MBydF7kwsQbo88dFeDJQNg58DXFGue8RnqQZD6/diutK5JR5h7yr8EBXQ42WPeSI5ACKpmX/LaFWM6ubfsRXoADvG2Rr1S75vpes43f0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757502571; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BQ2XtYRwei+F/8LMUKBdKEm+z8pxUaNiGAkH40rNEKc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aAahDEdcxcGr/xj96moukanyU8tGe3EGuSvA1E5ttLawRz3Z5zh+ArUoHsbQrzkzn4XyUfALUOEZxi64mpN2r6hAPW11AupcPE9UqzMC+Xb1HqM32frzTEAQFKhR/JMynoLH/nK3a41rbXv2EBDXgc5/SYUfTiyEfaRvhn4UK6k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=JYONtoEZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JYONtoEZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1757502568; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EEfKAAgF77B0N35cHlVCZR8H3qoPVBq2FQNy2mJIamk=; b=JYONtoEZ9+9kfTQXg5T9LNFeOUV5afuSWSIja66oCJoSl0HwnqC2MPn4sq5tZYkGCMcAw0 kkLwD5fhfCxrAGFVNZHJZFW3/9DrDo0gyUyOb+HZ3pChFiz7pgQ1WRt82VBlD/CV8rX3Ai Ziq9RWwsE1+vICG+0ChuskRzGElGJaE= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-661-phmbjhz0MliiW7LqofRrjg-1; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 07:09:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: phmbjhz0MliiW7LqofRrjg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: phmbjhz0MliiW7LqofRrjg_1757502564 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45b98de0e34so52180155e9.0 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757502563; x=1758107363; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EEfKAAgF77B0N35cHlVCZR8H3qoPVBq2FQNy2mJIamk=; b=cYAwLwZI/62rneI7Kn4FfPp56prWqlo3HmNuOvf5+jj3blwKjZ4pf00aa47gwUbPxN nITyQzQRzNuo6m28tkpOtjhl99oWGDa+7ewtFPF4UqlsF1cXWL459DUVPR1vbqCYJ4dL v+8/i84QjDlKI7sHm3cNBgMUzp6T0o9GZBYiqrm4lmHto3l2tIYKNomVGIcmQZ3F4TIh k3yR0b2gXm5nmJbswSJqg/NMgM5ia0+Z+fDyMdiuoDUbbAauUXFc4cSM3T+pYYGODCXr 1sykYJHIM29jgRSt3wRfEg5qYy4Mk5H+CPyn34Zap9lwPMlk1vKjS4q30rMt1hZDM6f6 p6sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJw9AR7UFp/+rzbQDZXwBI+ih74wroyGcWXCmKMtvl1U1Ornru +AkAZfPxLYPkomyISSXNMEZRytn3ylDsggfv3Fxz+6VdifP6NlvYXF4o9lAOZHNswNal0bQOJkn G4J+e2puOHBZs+3olkxByEvylEKtAewVVm1DCJyIhhmNoUQn5pxVTgwUYGug+Fou9UA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctbrQI6RBRK+BiatKVjOAvA+7wzt0NRpIctSB8pEP1lYNbiV/Di99Zk+YjudWa 9GpU0MZTRu02HXmBvNA0m4ccc6Je6aoEF0dDoh0yknr+/bSfKHch4n0lu57dhgHPhX6/1+/0bqD 4tQ5b8y2neE4g/b1LHnm2+DVejkTjVe1c0gOgr7/IWn+8u7JsPKZwO9sALX5YsC8JDGAj9h6aXr 59JmSi95LrSCD9vUJoitWGzo9/709jjJ0CUIl8ytqiVZb6l3+XXJlTB3v5NUFsORFbxsLymAENJ xeQR7Dn2KoMCjhAeiQL8NunHZYUmUJdR0jf6lqalLtOlO2cteIKkN8BDcvheAlEyhnSOo6cchi3 hv8wKA/OHZFabfLf/xAnbZg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2889:b0:3e5:50:e044 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3e643555859mr13543078f8f.45.1757502563469; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtsE6TP99LwCM9DefOr4NgVBIR7vSn0IU371t63+HnR3UaFYs5LDu32sAvz1H1Dto10pgN1g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2889:b0:3e5:50:e044 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3e643555859mr13543046f8f.45.1757502563021; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (62-151-111-63.jazzfree.ya.com. [62.151.111.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-45df1ba282dsm26332925e9.5.2025.09.10.04.09.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Javier Martinez Canillas To: Brett A C Sheffield Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Simona Vetter , Helge Deller , Thomas Zimmermann , Lee Jones , Murad Masimov , Yongzhen Zhang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs" In-Reply-To: References: <20250910095124.6213-3-bacs@librecast.net> <20250910095124.6213-5-bacs@librecast.net> <87frcuegb7.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:09:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87cy7yef8f.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Brett A C Sheffield writes: > On 2025-09-10 12:46, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Brett A C Sheffield writes: >> >> Hello Brett, >> >> > This reverts commit 13d28e0c79cbf69fc6f145767af66905586c1249. >> > >> > Commit ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when >> > removing conflicting FBs") was backported to 5.15.y LTS. This causes a >> > regression where all virtual consoles stop responding during boot at: >> > >> > "Populating /dev with existing devices through uevents ..." >> > >> > Reverting the commit fixes the regression. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Brett A C Sheffield >> > --- >> >> In the other email you said: >> >> > Newer stable kernels with this >> > patch (6.1.y, 6.6.y, 6.12,y, 6.15.y, 6.16.y) and mainline are unaffected. >> >> But are you proposing to revert the mentioned commit in mainline too >> or just in the 5.15.y LTS tree ? > > Only the 5.15.y tree. Sorry - that could have been clearer. There's no > regression anywhere else. Mainline and other stable kernels are all ok. > That's what I thought but just wanted to confirm that was the case. Thanks! > Cheers, > > > Brett > -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat